IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i8p743-d609129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Riparian Zone Nitrogen Management through the Development of the Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM) in a Formerly Glaciated Watershed of the US Northeast

Author

Listed:
  • Marzia Tamanna

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Soni M. Pradhanang

    (Department of Geosciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Arthur J. Gold

    (Department of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Kelly Addy

    (Department of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Philippe G. Vidon

    (Sustainable Resources Management Department, The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

Abstract

The Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM) was developed, calibrated and validated for both hydrologic and water quality data for eight riparian buffers located in a formerly glaciated watershed (upper Pawcatuck River Watershed, Rhode Island) of the US Northeast. The Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source model (AnnAGNPS) was used to predict the runoff and sediment loading to the riparian buffer. Overall, results showed REMM simulated water table depths (WTDs) and groundwater NO 3 -N concentrations at the stream edge (Zone 1) in good agreement with measured values. The model evaluation statistics showed that, hydrologically REMM performed better for site 1, site 4, and site 8 among the eight buffers, whereas REMM simulated better groundwater NO 3 -N concentrations in the case of site 1, site 5, and site 7 when compared to the other five sites. The interquartile range of mean absolute error for WTDs was 3.5 cm for both the calibration and validation periods. In the case of NO 3 -N concentrations prediction, the interquartile range of the root mean square error was 0.25 mg/L and 0.69 mg/L for the calibration and validation periods, respectively, whereas the interquartile range of d for NO 3 -N concentrations was 0.20 and 0.48 for the calibration and validation period, respectively. Moreover, REMM estimation of % N-removal from Zone 3 to Zone 1 was 19.7%, and 19.8% of N against actual measured 19.1%, and 26.6% of N at site 7 and site 8, respectively. The sensitivity analyses showed that changes in the volumetric water content between field capacity and saturation (soil porosity) were driving water table and denitrification.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzia Tamanna & Soni M. Pradhanang & Arthur J. Gold & Kelly Addy & Philippe G. Vidon, 2021. "Riparian Zone Nitrogen Management through the Development of the Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM) in a Formerly Glaciated Watershed of the US Northeast," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:8:p:743-:d:609129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:8:p:743-:d:609129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.