IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i7p682-d597060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High Accuracy Pre-Harvest Sugarcane Yield Forecasting Model Utilizing Drone Image Analysis, Data Mining, and Reverse Design Method

Author

Listed:
  • Bhoomin Tanut

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand)

  • Rattapoom Waranusast

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand)

  • Panomkhawn Riyamongkol

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand)

Abstract

This article presents a new model for forecasting the sugarcane yield that substantially reduces current rates of assessment errors, providing a more reliable pre-harvest assessment tool for sugarcane production. This model, called the Wondercane model, integrates various environmental data obtained from sugar mill surveys and government agencies with the analysis of aerial images of sugarcane fields obtained with drones. The drone images enable the calculation of the proportion of unusable sugarcane (the defect rate) in the field. Defective cane can result from adverse weather or other cultivation issues. The Wondercane model is developed on the principle of determining the yield not through data in regression form but rather through data in classification form. The Reverse Design method and the Similarity Relationship method are applied for feature extraction of the input factors and the target outputs. The model utilizes data mining to recognize and classify the dataset from the sugarcane field. Results show that the optimal performance of the model is achieved when: (1) the number of Input Factors is five, (2) the number of Target Outputs is 32, and (3) the Random Forest algorithm is used. The model recognized the 2019 training data with an accuracy of 98.21%, and then it correctly forecast the yield of the 2019 test data with an accuracy of 89.58% (10.42% error) when compared to the actual yield. The Wondercane model correctly forecast the harvest yield of a 2020 dataset with an accuracy of 98.69% (1.31% error). The Wondercane model is therefore an accurate and robust tool that can substantially reduce the issue of sugarcane yield estimate errors and provide the sugar industry with improved pre-harvest assessment of sugarcane yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhoomin Tanut & Rattapoom Waranusast & Panomkhawn Riyamongkol, 2021. "High Accuracy Pre-Harvest Sugarcane Yield Forecasting Model Utilizing Drone Image Analysis, Data Mining, and Reverse Design Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:682-:d:597060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Matese & Salvatore Filippo Di Gennaro, 2018. "Practical Applications of a Multisensor UAV Platform Based on Multispectral, Thermal and RGB High Resolution Images in Precision Viticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Robin Mink & Avishek Dutta & Gerassimos G. Peteinatos & Markus Sökefeld & Johannes Joachim Engels & Michael Hahn & Roland Gerhards, 2018. "Multi-Temporal Site-Specific Weed Control of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Rumex crispus L. in Maize and Sugar Beet Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based Mapping," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Omolola M. Adisa & Joel O. Botai & Abiodun M. Adeola & Abubeker Hassen & Christina M. Botai & Daniel Darkey & Eyob Tesfamariam, 2019. "Application of Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Maize Production in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Ammoniaci & Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis & Rita Perria & Paolo Storchi, 2021. "State of the Art of Monitoring Technologies and Data Processing for Precision Viticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Alessia Cogato & Franco Meggio & Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati & Francesco Marinello, 2019. "Extreme Weather Events in Agriculture: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Ezenne, G.I. & Jupp, Louise & Mantel, S.K. & Tanner, J.L., 2019. "Current and potential capabilities of UAS for crop water productivity in precision agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 158-164.
    4. Joanna Paziewska & Antoni Rzonca, 2022. "Integration of Thermal and RGB Data Obtained by Means of a Drone for Interdisciplinary Inventory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Selection of Independent Variables for Crop Yield Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network Models with Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Yorghos Voutos & Phivos Mylonas & John Katheniotis & Anastasia Sofou, 2019. "A Survey on Intelligent Agricultural Information Handling Methodologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Anzhen Qin & Dongfeng Ning & Zhandong Liu & Sen Li & Ben Zhao & Aiwang Duan, 2021. "Determining Threshold Values for a Crop Water Stress Index-Based Center Pivot Irrigation with Optimum Grain Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Mohammad Fatin Fatihur Rahman & Shurui Fan & Yan Zhang & Lei Chen, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Hong, Yang, 2020. "Crop Water footprint estimation and modeling using an artificial neural network approach in the Nile Delta, Egypt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Ivana Rendulić Jelušić & Branka Šakić Bobić & Zoran Grgić & Saša Žiković & Mirela Osrečak & Ivana Puhelek & Marina Anić & Marko Karoglan, 2022. "Grape Quality Zoning and Selective Harvesting in Small Vineyards—To Adopt or Not to Adopt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Rigas Giovos & Dimitrios Tassopoulos & Dionissios Kalivas & Nestor Lougkos & Anastasia Priovolou, 2021. "Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices in Viticulture: A Critical Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Alexander Kocian & Luca Incrocci, 2020. "Learning from Data to Optimize Control in Precision Farming," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:682-:d:597060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.