Author
Listed:
- Benjamin A. Saylor
(Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)
- Cody L. McCary
(Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- E. Cole Diepersloot
(Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)
- Celso Heinzen
(Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)
- Matheus R. Pupo
(Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)
- Jéssica O. Gusmão
(Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-900, MG, Brazil)
- Lucas G. Ghizzi
(Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Department of Animal Nutrition and Animal Production, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil)
- Halima Sultana
(Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Luiz F. Ferraretto
(Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)
Abstract
Our objective was to assess the effect of forage processor roll gap width and storage length on fermentation, nutrient composition, kernel processing score (KPS), and ruminal in situ starch disappearance (isSD) of whole-plant maize silage harvested at different maturities. Samples from a single maize silage hybrid at three harvest maturities (1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 kernel milk line (early, intermediate, and late, respectively)) processed with two roll gap widths (1 and 3 mm) were collected and stored in quadruplicate vacuum pouches for 0, 30, 120, or 240 d. Lactic acid concentrations were greater, and pH was reduced in early and intermediate maturity silage compared to late maturity silage. Ruminal isSD was greatest for early maturity silage, intermediate for the intermediate maturity silage, and lowest for the late maturity silage, but differences in isSD due to maturity were diminished after prolonged storage. Kernel processing score was greatest in late maturity silage processed through a 1 mm roll gap and lowest in late maturity silage processed through the 3 mm roll gap. For early and intermediate maturity silages, no differences in KPS were observed between the two roll gap widths. Minimal effects of maturity and roll gap width on fatty acids (FA) and amino acids (AA) were observed. Concentrations of total AA decreased as storage length progressed. Results support the premise that the silo is a dynamic system that undergoes numerous chemical changes throughout the storage period.
Suggested Citation
Benjamin A. Saylor & Cody L. McCary & E. Cole Diepersloot & Celso Heinzen & Matheus R. Pupo & Jéssica O. Gusmão & Lucas G. Ghizzi & Halima Sultana & Luiz F. Ferraretto, 2021.
"Effect of Forage Processor Roll Gap Width and Storage Length on Fermentation Profile, Nutrient Composition, Kernel Processing Score, and Starch Disappearance of Whole-Plant Maize Silage Harvested at T,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:574-:d:580460
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:574-:d:580460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.