IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i4p322-d530996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vegetation Response to Removal of Plant Groups and Grass Seeding in a Microphyllous Desert Shrubland: A 4-Year Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Mellado

    (Department of Animal Nutrition, Autonomous Agrarian University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Juan A. Encina-Domínguez

    (Department of Natural Resources, Autonomous Agrarian University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • José E. García

    (Department of Animal Nutrition, Autonomous Agrarian University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Eduardo Estrada-Castillón

    (Faculty of Forestry Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Linares 67700, Mexico)

  • José R. Arévalo

    (Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, University of La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain)

Abstract

Grazing is one of the most important land management activities worldwide, and cases of overgrazing increase erosion, land degradation, and plant invasion. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on individual species and species composition in response to groups of plants removals or grass seeding after four years of vegetation transformation in a microphyllous desert shrubland excluded from cattle grazing. Nine treatments involved (1) clearing of vegetation and seeding of Bouteloua curtipendula (BOCU), a native grass, (2) clearing and seeding of Chloris gayana (CHGA), an introduce grass from Africa, (3) clearing except for grasses (GRA), (4) clearing except for grasses and fodder shrubs (GRA-SHR), (5) free grazing by cattle (GRAZ), (6) clearing except fodder shrubs (SHR), (7) no modification (CON), (8) clearing of all plants (BARE), and (9) clearing except plants not eaten by cattle (UND). Treatments were replicated five times each in 10 m × 10 m experimental plots. Plots were surveyed for density, cover of all plants, and standing forage. Total plant cover was higher in CON and UND than the other treatments. Except for BOCU, where forage production was the highest, forage production ha −1 was low among all other treatments. Plant density was highest in SHR and lowest in CON. Results after four years of transformation indicate that seeded Chloris gayana failed to become established, but seeding of Bouteloua curtipendula was able to persist, and had the greatest influence on the vegetation restoration, which is what we consider the most appropriate restoration treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Mellado & Juan A. Encina-Domínguez & José E. García & Eduardo Estrada-Castillón & José R. Arévalo, 2021. "Vegetation Response to Removal of Plant Groups and Grass Seeding in a Microphyllous Desert Shrubland: A 4-Year Field Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:322-:d:530996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/322/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/322/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Ramón Arévalo & Cristina González-Montelongo & Juan A. Encina-Domínguez & Eduardo García & Miguel Mellado, 2022. "Changes in Richness and Species Composition after Five Years of Grazing Exclusion in an Endemic Pasture of Northern Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. José R. Arévalo & Juan A. Encina-Domínguez & Sait Juanes-Márquez & Perpetuo Álvarez-Vázquez & Juan A. Nuñez-Colima & Miguel Mellado, 2021. "Restoration of Rangelands Invaded by Amelichloa clandestina (Hack.) Arriaga & Barkworth after 12 Years of Agriculture Abandonment (Coahuila, Mexico)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:322-:d:530996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.