Author
Listed:
- Musen Wang
(School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
- Run Gao
(College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
- Marcia Franco
(Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2 C, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)
- David B. Hannaway
(Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)
- Wencan Ke
(School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)
- Zitong Ding
(School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)
- Zhu Yu
(College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
- Xusheng Guo
(School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)
Abstract
The influence of mixing alfalfa with whole-plant corn in different proportions on the fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of silage was investigated. Alfalfa and whole-plant corn, harvested at dry matter content of 276.47 and 328.43 g/kg fresh weight, accordingly, were chopped to approximately 2 cm and mixed at ratios of 100:0 (C0, control), 80:20 (C20), 60:40 (C40), 40:60 (C60), 20:80 (C80) and 0:100 (C100) on a fresh weight basis, respectively. Silos of each treatment were produced in triplicate and anaerobically fermented in darkness for 100 days at room temperature (20–21 °C). At silo opening, silage fermentation characteristics and bacterial composition and diversity were analyzed. The C0 silage was weakly preserved, evidenced by a low lactic acid concentration and a high value of pH, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen. With corn proportion in the mixture increasing from 0% to 40%, silage pH, acetic acid, butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen level decreased, whereas the value of lactic acid and lactic acid to acetic acid ratio increased. The C40, C60, C80 and C100 silages’ Flieg score, used to evaluate the overall fermentation quality, was above 80 and higher than C0 (25) and C20 (61) silages. The C0 silage contained a complex bacterial community at the genus level, consisting mainly of Enterococcus (38.86%), Enterobacteria (20.61%), Rhizobium (8.45%), Lactobacillus (8.15%), Methylobacterium (5.54%) and Weissella (5.24%). As corn percentage increased from 0% to 40%, the relative abundance of desirable Lactobacillus increased and undesirable Rhizobium and Methylobacterium population reduced. With corn proportion in the mixture increasing from 0% to 40%, inclusion of corn to alfalfa at ensiling significantly improved silage fermentation quality and shifted the bacterial community for better silage preservation. Overall, high quality silage was produced when alfalfa was combined with at least 40% whole-plant corn on a fresh weight basis.
Suggested Citation
Musen Wang & Run Gao & Marcia Franco & David B. Hannaway & Wencan Ke & Zitong Ding & Zhu Yu & Xusheng Guo, 2021.
"Effect of Mixing Alfalfa with Whole-Plant Corn in Different Proportions on Fermentation Characteristics and Bacterial Community of Silage,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:174-:d:502546
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:174-:d:502546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.