IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i1p61-d479762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Root Distribution of Brassica napus and Vicia faba within the Sheath of Root or Earthworm Biopore

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Petzoldt

    (Department of Crop Science, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Timo Kautz

    (Department of Crop Science, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Root growth through biopores is facilitated by low mechanical impedance and nutrient enrichment due to the deposition of organic material at the biopore sheath. Plant roots and earthworms impact biopore sheath properties differently. However, the literature lacks a quantitative study of the root distribution within the sheath of pores, which were originated by taproots or earthworms. According to previous literature on pore connectivity, it can be hypothesized that precrops encourage root growth into the biopore sheath in comparison to an earthworm characterized sheath. A pot experiment was performed to compare the root distribution of spring oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.) and faba bean ( Vicia faba L.) within the biopore sheath of two different biopore types. The biopore sheath was characterized by taprooted chicory ( Cichorium intybus L.) or anecic earthworm ( Lumbricus terrestris L.). Roots were sampled at the biopore lumen and at lateral distances of 0–2, 2–4, 4–8 (sheath) and 20–36 mm (bulk soil) from the biopore wall surface. In both pore types >50% of the root length (cm) and >70% fine roots of oilseed rape were found in a comparatively small soil area (Lumen + 2 mm). On the contrary, faba bean grew primarily through the bulk soil with >75% root length and rarely into the biopore sheath in both pore types. In both species there was a lateral decrease of the total nitrogen (N t )-content from biopore wall (Mean ± SE: 0.061% ± 0.002%) to bulk soil (0.053% ± 0.002%), but no significant difference between the pore types. The results of the current study illustrate that the root growth of spring oilseed rape and faba bean was not encouraged by the precrop in comparison to the earthworm characterized sheath.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Petzoldt & Timo Kautz, 2021. "Root Distribution of Brassica napus and Vicia faba within the Sheath of Root or Earthworm Biopore," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:61-:d:479762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Petzoldt & Miriam Athmann & Andreas Buechse & Timo Kautz, 2020. "Root Growth of Hordeum vulgare and Vicia faba in the Biopore Sheath," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:61-:d:479762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.