Author
Listed:
- Anon Janket
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Nimitr Vorasoot
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Banyong Toomsan
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Wanwipa Kaewpradit
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Piyada Theerakulpisut
(Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Carl Corley Holbrook
(Crop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA 31793, USA)
- Craig K. Kvien
(Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA)
- Sanun Jogloy
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
- Poramate Banterng
(Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)
Abstract
Matching fertilization with crop needs is important for maximizing yields and reducing fertilizer losses. Seasonal variation in nutrient uptake dynamics is poorly understood and thus, the ability to optimize fertilization strategies is limited. This study aims to investigate the effects of planting dates on macronutrient uptake dynamics in cassava genotypes with full irrigation. The performance of cassava genotypes, i.e., CMR38-125-77, Kasetsart 50 and Rayong 11, were evaluated in the early rainy (ERS) and post rainy seasons (PRS) for two years using a randomized complete block design with four replicates. The plants were harvested at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Planting dates had significant effects on the accumulation of dry matter and storage roots as well as nutrient uptakes and partitioning. On average, the total nutrient uptake per plant to produce 2831–3279 g of biomass with 1244–1810 g of storage roots in the ERS varied among cassava genotypes, ranging from 21.1–24.3 g N, 5.1–5.9 g P, 26.5–29.5 g K, 14.1–22.2 g Ca, 6.1–7.6 g Mg and 2.0–2.3 g S. The total nutrient uptake per plant to produce 3353–3824 g of biomass with 1604–2253 g of storage roots in the PRS ranged from 27.1–32.4 g N, 5.2–6.0 g P, 29.1–31.3 g K, 11.9–20.3 g Ca, 7.3–9.9 g Mg and 1.2–1.5 g S. In the ERS, the majority of the total nutrient uptake occurred at the early growth stages, whereas in the PRS, this occurred at the mid- to late growth stages. At final harvest, the percentages of nutrient removal by the storage roots for ERS were 24.7–36.0% N, 26.0–32.3% P, 43.4–51.5% K, 12.4–17.6% Ca, 22.2–31.5% Mg and 27.2–31.5% S, whereas in the PRS the percentages were 30.4–44.4% N, 33.3–41.6% P, 44.7–57.3% K, 12.0–15.1% Ca, 20.2–28.1% Mg and 12.0–25.4% S. CMR38-125-77 exhibited satisfactory performance in nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency and storage roots yield across the planting dates. The evidence obtained from this study would greatly facilitate more efficient adoption of precision agriculture in cassava production by applying recommended fertilizers, e.g., rates, kinds and timings, according to crop demand in each growing season in Thailand and for choosing superior cassava genotypes.
Suggested Citation
Anon Janket & Nimitr Vorasoot & Banyong Toomsan & Wanwipa Kaewpradit & Piyada Theerakulpisut & Carl Corley Holbrook & Craig K. Kvien & Sanun Jogloy & Poramate Banterng, 2021.
"Quantitative Evaluation of Macro-Nutrient Uptake by Cassava in a Tropical Savanna Climate,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1199-:d:690195
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1199-:d:690195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.