IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i11p1145-d679263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth and Yield Responses of Pot-Grown Long Bean and Luffa to Nitrogen Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlin Wang

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, 2550 Hull Road, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Gabriel Maltais-Landry

    (Soil and Water Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, McCarty Hall A, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Bala Rathinasabapathi

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, 2550 Hull Road, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Steven A. Sargent

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, 2550 Hull Road, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Guodong Liu

    (Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, 2550 Hull Road, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

Abstract

Optimizing nitrogen (N) input rates for vegetable production is crucial in Florida to reducing production costs and enhancing environmental sustainability. Asian vegetables emerging and expanding in Florida not only increase profit for growers, but also enhance food diversity for consumers. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the partitioning and usage of N and carbohydrates in two Asian vegetable crops: long bean ( Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.) and angled luffa ( Luffa acutangular (L.) Roxb.). Four N rates (0, 0.91, 1.36, and 1.81 g N pot −1 ) were compared in a high tunnel trial to understand the influence of N fertilization on the two crops. For long bean, plant biomass was highest at the highest N input, and N-fertilized plants had significantly higher leaf greenness than the control at the flower initiation and mid-reproductive stages. However, N inputs had no apparent effect on yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), blade total N concentration, roots (length, volume, dry biomass, and root-to-shoot ratio), or nodules (number plant −1 and biomass). For luffa, the highest N input had significantly greater total yield, fruit number, and leaf greenness at the flower initiation and mid-reproductive stages, although there was no significant difference in shoot biomass, blade total N content, or NUE among treatments. Within the range of these N rates, our results suggest that higher N inputs promoted vegetative growth of long bean, whereas reproductive growth was promoted in luffa. This study highlights differences in the sink–source relationship of N for long bean and luffa production in high tunnel, which can guide N input decisions for these two crops that are rapidly expanding in the USA.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlin Wang & Gabriel Maltais-Landry & Bala Rathinasabapathi & Steven A. Sargent & Guodong Liu, 2021. "Growth and Yield Responses of Pot-Grown Long Bean and Luffa to Nitrogen Rates," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:11:p:1145-:d:679263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bland, R.G. & Knausenberger, W.I., 1984. "Predators and Parasites of Insect Pests on Cantaloupe and Asparagus Bean, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands," 20th Annual Meeting, October 21-26, 1984, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 261557, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:11:p:1145-:d:679263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.