IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i10p956-d648728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Strategies for Absorbance Readings from an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay—A Case Study about Testing Genotypes of Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) for Resistance against Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus (BNYVV)

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas M. Lange

    (Breeding Informatics Group, University of Göttingen, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Martin Wutke

    (Breeding Informatics Group, University of Göttingen, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Lisa Bertram

    (KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, 37574 Einbeck, Germany)

  • Harald Keunecke

    (KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, 37574 Einbeck, Germany)

  • Friedrich Kopisch-Obuch

    (KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, 37574 Einbeck, Germany)

  • Armin O. Schmitt

    (Breeding Informatics Group, University of Göttingen, Margarethe von Wrangell-Weg 7, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
    Center of Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), University of Göttingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

The Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) causes rhizomania in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.), which is one of the most destructive diseases in sugar beet worldwide. In breeding projects towards resistance against BNYVV, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is used to determine the virus concentration in plant roots and, thus, the resistance levels of genotypes. Here, we present a simulation study to generate 10,000 small samples from the estimated density functions of ELISA values from susceptible and resistant sugar beet genotypes. We apply receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to these samples to optimise the cutoff values for sample sizes from two to eight and determine the false positive rates (FPR), true positive rates (TPR), and area under the curve (AUC). We present, furthermore, an alternative approach based upon Bayes factors to improve the decision procedure. The Bayesian approach has proven to be superior to the simple cutoff approach. The presented results could help evaluate or improve existing breeding programs and help design future selection procedures based upon ELISA. An R-script for the classification of sample data based upon Bayes factors is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas M. Lange & Martin Wutke & Lisa Bertram & Harald Keunecke & Friedrich Kopisch-Obuch & Armin O. Schmitt, 2021. "Decision Strategies for Absorbance Readings from an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay—A Case Study about Testing Genotypes of Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) for Resistance against Beet Necrotic Yellow," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:956-:d:648728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:956-:d:648728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.