IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i10p927-d643917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gastric Lesions in Culled Sows: An Underestimated Welfare Issue in Modern Swine Production

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Cybulski

    (Goodvalley Agro S.A., Dworcowa 25, 77-320 Przechlewo, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Woźniak

    (Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Joachim Urban

    (Independent Researcher, Mickiewicza 7, 77-420 Lipka, Poland)

  • Tomasz Stadejek

    (Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Specific anatomy of the porcine stomach results in a high risk of ulceration in the pars oesophagea. A fully developed ulcer leads to intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding followed by clinical symptoms of chronic pain; thus, gastric ulceration in pigs causes significant production losses and serious welfare problems. Nowadays, gastric ulceration is common in domestic pigs throughout the world, but a great deal of attention has been directed at finishers. This paper was intended to provide new data on the prevalence of the disease in commercially reared highly prolific sows. The study was carried out on 329 culled sows from four commercial farms located in Northern Poland. The severity of gross pathological lesions of pars oesophagea was assigned to grade 0 (no lesions), 1 (parakeratosis), 2 (erosion), or 3 (gastric ulceration with or without stenosis) by a veterinary practitioner. Abattoir analysis revealed 66.6% of sows’ stomachs with some degree of alterations. Gastric ulceration was detected in 45.5% of examined organs. Parakeratosis and erosion were found in 1.2 and 15.8% of stomachs, respectively. The investigation did not find any oesphageal strictures. Our investigation of the problem in high health status hyper-prolific sows showed the lowest prevalence of gastric lesions (i.e., ulcerative and preulcerative alterations collectively) compared to earlier studies but the highest percentage of gastric ulcers. The results indicate that gastric ulcers may be a highly prevalent and underestimated welfare issue in sows in modern pig production, worth further studies focusing on particular risk factors related to feeding, genetics, management issues, and sows longevity.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Cybulski & Aleksandra Woźniak & Joachim Urban & Tomasz Stadejek, 2021. "Gastric Lesions in Culled Sows: An Underestimated Welfare Issue in Modern Swine Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-6, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:927-:d:643917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Cybulski & Magdalena Larska & Aleksandra Woźniak & Artur Jabłoński & Tomasz Stadejek, 2021. "The Dietary Risk Factors of Gastric Ulcers in Finishing Pigs from 16 Polish Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:927-:d:643917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.