IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i9p366-d400915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Watermelon Rootstock/Scion Relationships and the Effects of Fruit-Thinning and Stem-Pruning on Yield and Postharvest Fruit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Merav Zaaroor-Presman

    (Department of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
    Robert H. Smith, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel)

  • Sharon Alkalai-Tuvia

    (Department of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Daniel Chalupowicz

    (Department of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Marina Beniches

    (Department of Growing, Production and Environmental Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Abraham Gamliel

    (Department of Growing, Production and Environmental Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Elazar Fallik

    (Department of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of stem-pruning and fruit-thinning on the yield of marketable watermelon fruit (>5 kg) and watermelon quality after four days of postharvest storage at 22 °C (marketing simulation). We examined the fruits from non-grafted and grafted plants (TZ and Nurit rootstocks) for two consecutive years. Grafting increased the number of marketable fruit per m 2 . The weight of the average marketable fruit was increased by pruning, but was not affected by thinning or by the choice of rootstock. The level of total soluble solids was higher among fruits from Nurit rootstock. Flesh texture was improved by grafting, but was not affected by thinning or pruning. Thinning improved the taste of the fruit significantly better than stem-pruning did. Grafting (both rootstocks) was associated with crispier fruits. The fruits from Nurit-grafted plants tasted best. The combination of grafting + fruit-thinning increased the fruit lycopene content. The highest levels of vitamin C were found among the fruit from Nurit-grafted plants and the pruned + Nurit-grafted plants, in particular. Overall, fruit quality was affected mainly by grafting onto Nurit rootstock in combination with fruit-thinning and less by stem-pruning. However, not all internal and nutritional quality parameters were significantly affected by the grafting + fruit-thinning treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Merav Zaaroor-Presman & Sharon Alkalai-Tuvia & Daniel Chalupowicz & Marina Beniches & Abraham Gamliel & Elazar Fallik, 2020. "Watermelon Rootstock/Scion Relationships and the Effects of Fruit-Thinning and Stem-Pruning on Yield and Postharvest Fruit Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:366-:d:400915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:366-:d:400915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.