IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i8p348-d397359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soybean Yield Estimation and Its Components: A Linear Regression Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo Chan Fu Wei

    (College of Agriculture “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of Sao Paulo, 11 Padua Dias Avenue, Piracicaba 13418-900, Brazil)

  • José Paulo Molin

    (College of Agriculture “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of Sao Paulo, 11 Padua Dias Avenue, Piracicaba 13418-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Soybean yield estimation is either based on yield monitors or agro-meteorological and satellite imagery data, but they present several limiting factors regarding on-farm decision level. Aware that machine learning approaches have been largely applied to estimate soybean yield and the availability of data regarding soybean yield and its components (number of grains (NG) and thousand grains weight (TGW)), there is an opportunity to study their relationships. The objective was to explore the relationships between soybean yield and its components, generate equations to estimate yield and evaluate its prediction accuracy. The training dataset was composed of soybean yield and its components’ data from 2010 to 2019. Linear regression models based on NG, TGW and yield were fitted on the training dataset and applied to a validation dataset composed of 58 on-field collected samples. It was found that globally TGW and NG presented weak (r = 0.50) and strong (r = 0.92) linear relationships with yield, respectively. In addition to that, applying the fitted models to the validation dataset, model based on NG presented the highest accuracy, coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.70, mean absolute error (MAE) of 639.99 kg ha −1 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 726.67 kg ha −1 .

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo Chan Fu Wei & José Paulo Molin, 2020. "Soybean Yield Estimation and Its Components: A Linear Regression Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:8:p:348-:d:397359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/8/348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/8/348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fritz, Steffen & See, Linda & Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso & Waldner, François & Jacques, Damien & Becker-Reshef, Inbal & Whitcraft, Alyssa & Baruth, Bettina & Bonifacio, Rogerio & Crutchfield, Jim & Rembo, 2019. "A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 258-272.
    2. Coelho, Anderson Prates & Faria, Rogério Teixeira de & Leal, Fábio Tiraboschi & Barbosa, José de Arruda & Dalri, Alexandre Barcellos & Rosalen, David Luciano, 2019. "Estimation of irrigated oats yield using spectral indices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Borowska & Janusz Prusiński, 2021. "Effect of soybean cultivars sowing dates on seed yield and its correlation with yield parameters," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 360-366.
    2. Yan Guo & Xiaonan Hu & Zepeng Wang & Wei Tang & Deyu Liu & Yunzhong Luo & Hongxiang Xu, 2021. "The butterfly effect in the price of agricultural products: A multidimensional spatial-temporal association mining," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(11), pages 457-467.
    3. Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Małgorzata Pawłowska & Elżbieta Harasim & Lucjan Pawłowski, 2023. "Strategies of Climate Change Mitigation in Agriculture Plant Production—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clark, Robert & Dahlhaus, Peter & Robinson, Nathan & Larkins, Jo-ann & Morse-McNabb, Elizabeth, 2023. "Matching the model to the available data to predict wheat, barley, or canola yield: A review of recently published models and data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Agnese Krievina & Ilze Upite & Daniels Kotovs, 2022. "LASAM Model: An Important Tool in the Decision Support System for Policymakers and Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Gábor Bakó & Zsolt Molnár & Lilla Bakk & Ferenc Horváth & Luca Fehér & Örs Ábrám & Edina Morvai & Csaba Biro & Gergely Pápay & Attila Fűrész & Károly Penksza & Diána Pácsonyi & Krisztina Demény & Erik, 2021. "Toward a High Spatial Resolution Aerial Monitoring Network for Nature Conservation—How Can Remote Sensing Help Protect Natural Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Qiu, Bingwen & Jian, Zeyu & Yang, Peng & Tang, Zhenghong & Zhu, Xiaolin & Duan, Mingjie & Yu, Qiangyi & Chen, Xuehong & Zhang, Miao & Tu, Ping & Xu, Weiming & Zhao, Zhiyuan, 2024. "Unveiling grain production patterns in China (2005–2020) towards targeted sustainable intensification," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Yan, Zhaojin & Xiao, Yijia & Cheng, Liang & Chen, Song & Zhou, Xiao & Ruan, Xiaoguang & Li, Manchun & He, Rong & Ran, Bin, 2020. "Analysis of global marine oil trade based on automatic identification system (AIS) data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Segundo G. Chavez & Jaris Veneros & Nilton B. Rojas-Briceño & Manuel Oliva-Cruz & Grobert A. Guadalupe & Ligia García, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Modeling of Rural Agricultural Land Use Change and Area Forecasts in Historical Time Series after COVID-19 Pandemic, Using Google Earth Engine in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Bregaglio, Simone & Ginaldi, Fabrizio & Raparelli, Elisabetta & Fila, Gianni & Bajocco, Sofia, 2023. "Improving crop yield prediction accuracy by embedding phenological heterogeneity into model parameter sets," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:8:p:348-:d:397359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.