IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i7p251-d378958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Hybrid and Grain Maturity Stage on the Ruminal Degradation and the Nutritive Value of Maize Forage for Silage

Author

Listed:
  • Egon Henrique Horst

    (Department of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil
    Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, E-24007 León, Spain)

  • Secundino López

    (Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, E-24007 León, Spain
    Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (IGM), CSIC-Universidad de León, Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, Spain)

  • Mikael Neumann

    (Department of Veterinarian Medicine, State University of Middle West, Guarapuava 85040-167, Brazil)

  • Francisco Javier Giráldez

    (Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (IGM), CSIC-Universidad de León, Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, Spain)

  • Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior

    (Department of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil)

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the effects of harvesting three maize hybrids at different maturity stages on the ruminal fermentation kinetics, fermentation end-products (volatile fatty acid, ammonia and methane) output, and digestibility of maize plant fractions, as well as the degradability of the resulting silage. Three hybrids were compared (Maximus VIP3, Defender VIP and Feroz VIP) harvested at three grain maturity stages (milk (R3), dough (R4) and dent (R5) grain), while silage samples were collected only at the dent grain stage (R5). Grain digestibility tended to decrease as the maturity stage progressed ( p < 0.05), while the whole-plant digestibility increased with increasing maturity for the three evaluated hybrids ( p < 0.05). The gas production of whole-plant at 24 h of incubation was higher for the Maximus hybrid than for the others ( p < 0.05), with average values of 188, 196 and 207 mL g −1 dry matter at stages R3, R4 and R5, respectively. For the in situ ruminal degradation kinetics of silage, instantly degradable dry matter and fiber potential degradability were greater with Maximus maize forage than with the other two hybrids. From the perspective of in vitro results, the Maximus VIP3 hybrid seems to be the most suitable for silage production when harvested between the dough and the dent grain stage of maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Egon Henrique Horst & Secundino López & Mikael Neumann & Francisco Javier Giráldez & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior, 2020. "Effects of Hybrid and Grain Maturity Stage on the Ruminal Degradation and the Nutritive Value of Maize Forage for Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:7:p:251-:d:378958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/7/251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/7/251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edwin Rafael Alvarado-Ramírez & Gilberto Ballesteros-Rodea & Abdelfattah Zeidan Mohamed Salem & José Reyes-Hernández & Camelia Alejandra Herrera-Corredor & Javier Hernández-Meléndez & Andrés Gilberto , 2023. "The Impact of Genotype on Chemical Composition, Feeding Value and In Vitro Rumen Degradability of Fresh and Ensiled Forage of Native Maize ( Zea mays L.) from Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Egon Henrique Horst & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior & Mikael Neumann & Secundino López, 2021. "Effects of the Harvest Stage of Maize Hybrids on the Chemical Composition of Plant Fractions: An Analysis of the Different Types of Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Egon Henrique Horst & Mikael Neumann, 2022. "Assessing Crop and Corn Silage Profile in Beef Cattle Farms in Southern Brazil: Ten Years’ Results," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Hajer Guesmi & Cyrine Darej & Piebiep Goufo & Salah Ben Youssef & Mohamed Chakroun & Hichem Ben Salem & Henrique Trindade & Nizar Moujahed, 2022. "Stubble Quality of Wheat Grown under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, and Effects of Stubble on the Fermentation Profile of Grazing Ewes’ Ruminal Fluid," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Egon Henrique Horst & Hajer Ammar & Mohamed Larbi Khouja & Julio Ernesto Vargas & Sonia Andrés & Secundino López, 2022. "In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modulating Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Jiang-Bo Hai & Poe Thinzar Bo & Xiang-Wei Gong & Chun-Juan Liu & Ke Dang & Li-Xin Tian & Rab Nawaz Soomro & Khaing Lin Aung & Bai-Li Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity Stages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:7:p:251-:d:378958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.