Author
Listed:
- Ahmed Jasim
(Department of Soil Sciences and Water Resources, Agricultural Engineering College, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 00964, Iraq
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)
- Ahmed Zaeen
(Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)
- Lakesh K. Sharma
(Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Sukhwinder K. Bali
(Department of Agroecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Chunzeng Wang
(Department of Environmental Science & Sustainability, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04769, USA)
- Aaron Buzza
(School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)
- Andrei Alyokhin
(School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)
Abstract
Applications of remote sensing are important in improving potato production through the broader adoption of precision agriculture. This technology could be useful in decreasing the potential contamination of soil and water due to the over-fertilization of agriculture crops. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of active sensors (Crop Circle™, Holland Scientific, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA and GreenSeeker™, Trimble Navigation Limited, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and passive sensors (multispectral imaging with Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAVs)) to predict total potato yield and phosphorus (P) uptake. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications and six P treatments, ranging from 0 to 280 kg P ha −1 , as triple superphosphate (46% P 2 O 5 ). Vegetation indices (VIs) and plant pigment levels were calculated at various time points during the potato growth cycle, correlated with total potato yields and P uptake by the stepwise fitting of multiple linear regression models. Data generated by Crop Circle™ and GreenSeeker™ had a low predictive value of potato yields, especially early in the season. Crop Circle™ performed better than GreenSeeker™ in predicting plant P uptake. In contrast, the passive sensor data provided good estimates of total yields early in the season but had a poor correlation with P uptake. The combined use of active and passive sensors presents an opportunity for better P management in potatoes.
Suggested Citation
Ahmed Jasim & Ahmed Zaeen & Lakesh K. Sharma & Sukhwinder K. Bali & Chunzeng Wang & Aaron Buzza & Andrei Alyokhin, 2020.
"Predicting Phosphorus and Potato Yield Using Active and Passive Sensors,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:564-:d:448633
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:564-:d:448633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.