IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2019i1p9-d303241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Respiration Dynamics in Bromus erectus -Dominated Grasslands under Different Management Intensities

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Francioni

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Laura Trozzo

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Marco Toderi

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Nora Baldoni

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Marina Allegrezza

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Giulio Tesei

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Ayaka Wenhong Kishimoto-Mo

    (National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan)

  • Lucia Foresi

    (East Malling Research, East Malling ME19 6BJ, UK)

  • Rodolfo Santilocchi

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

  • Paride D’Ottavio

    (Dipartimento di Science Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy)

Abstract

Reduction of soil greenhouse gas emissions is crucial to control increases in atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. Permanent grasslands are of considerable importance in climate change mitigation strategies as they cover about 13% of the global agricultural area. However, uncertainties remain for the effects of management practices on soil respiration, especially over the short term. This study investigated the influence of different mowing intensities on soil respiration over the short term for Bromus erectus -dominated grasslands in the central Apennines. From 2016 to 2018, soil respiration, temperature, and moisture were measured under three different management systems: customary management, intensive use, and abandonment. Both soil water content and temperature changed over time, however mowing did not affect soil water content while occasionally altered soil temperature. The intensive use promoted higher seasonal mean soil respiration compared to the abandonment only during the 2016 growing season. Soil temperature was the main driver of soil respiration above a soil water content threshold that varied little among treatments (18.23–22.71%). Below the thresholds, soil moisture was the main driver of soil respiration. These data suggest that different mowing regimes have little influence on soil respiration over the short term in Bromus erectus -dominated grasslands. Thus, more intensive use would not have significative impacts on soil respiration, at least over the short term. Future studies need to clarify the role of root mycorrhizal and microbial respiration in the light of climate change, considering the seasonal redistribution of the rainfall.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Francioni & Laura Trozzo & Marco Toderi & Nora Baldoni & Marina Allegrezza & Giulio Tesei & Ayaka Wenhong Kishimoto-Mo & Lucia Foresi & Rodolfo Santilocchi & Paride D’Ottavio, 2019. "Soil Respiration Dynamics in Bromus erectus -Dominated Grasslands under Different Management Intensities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:9-:d:303241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toderi, Marco & Francioni, Matteo & Seddaiu, Giovanna & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Trozzo, Laura & D’Ottavio, Paride, 2017. "Bottom-up design process of agri-environmental measures at a landscape scale: Evidence from case studies on biodiversity conservation and water protection," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 295-305.
    2. Matteo Francioni & Paride D’Ottavio & Roberto Lai & Laura Trozzo & Katarina Budimir & Lucia Foresi & Ayaka Wenhong Kishimoto-Mo & Nora Baldoni & Marina Allegrezza & Giulio Tesei & Marco Toderi, 2019. "Seasonal Soil Respiration Dynamics and Carbon-Stock Variations in Mountain Permanent Grasslands Compared to Arable Lands," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D'Alberto, R. & Targetti, S. & Schaller, L. & Bartolini, F. & Eichhorn, T. & Haltia, E. & Harmanny, K. & Le Gloux, F. & Nikolov, D. & Runge, T. & Vergamini, D. & Viaggi, D., 2024. "A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Clements, Jen & Lobley, Matt & Osborne, Juliet & Wills, Jane, 2021. "How can academic research on UK agri-environment schemes pivot to meet the addition of climate mitigation aims?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Berthet, Alice & Vincent, Audrey & Fleury, Philippe, 2021. "Water quality issues and agriculture: An international review of innovative policy schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Brown, Calum & Kovács, Eszter & Herzon, Irina & Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio & Albizua, Amaia & Galanaki, Antonia & Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna & McCracken, Davy & Olsson, Johanna Alkan & Zinngrebe, Yves, 2021. "Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Hao Wang & Sander Meijerink & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Gabriel Medina & Catherine Isley & J. Arbuckle, 2021. "Promoting sustainable agriculture: Iowa stakeholders’ perspectives on the US Farm Bill conservation programs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 173-194, January.
    7. Quintana, Diana C. & Díaz-Puente, José M. & Gallego-Moreno, Francisco, 2022. "Architectural and cultural heritage as a driver of social change in rural areas: 10 years (2009–2019) of management and recovery in Huete, a town of Cuenca, Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Huber, Robert & Zabel, Astrid & Schleiffer, Mirjam & Vroege, Willemijn & Brändle, Julia M. & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Conservation Costs Drive Enrolment in Agglomeration Bonus Scheme," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Matteo Francioni & Paride D’Ottavio & Roberto Lai & Laura Trozzo & Katarina Budimir & Lucia Foresi & Ayaka Wenhong Kishimoto-Mo & Nora Baldoni & Marina Allegrezza & Giulio Tesei & Marco Toderi, 2019. "Seasonal Soil Respiration Dynamics and Carbon-Stock Variations in Mountain Permanent Grasslands Compared to Arable Lands," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Nguyen, Chi & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Hanley, Nick & Schilizzi, Steven & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2022. "Spatial Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. Harry Wirngo Mairomi & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, 2021. "Community-Based Actors and Participation in Rangeland Management. Lessons from the Western Highlands of Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Graversgaard, Morten & Jacobsen, Brian H. & Hoffmann, Carl Christian & Dalgaard, Tommy & Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard & Kjaergaard, Charlotte & Powell, Neil & Strand, John A. & Feuerbach, Peter & Tonder, 2021. "Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden – historical lessons and emerging issues," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Reed, James & Ickowitz, Amy & Chervier, Colas & Djoudi, Houria & Moombe, Kaala & Ros-Tonen, Mirjam & Yanou, Malaika & Yuliani, Linda & Sunderland, Terry, 2020. "Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:9-:d:303241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.