IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gai/rpaper/116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organization of Local Self Governance in the Cities of Federal Level

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Starodubrovskaya

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)

  • Margarita Slavgorodskaya

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)

  • Sergey Zhavoronkov

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)

Abstract

The paper deals with issues of organization of local self/governance in the intraurban areas of the cities of federal significance and considers existing theoretical approaches to development of large urban areas and their governance, an international experience of organization of governance in large cities and urban agglomerations, local self/governance practices in the cities of federal significance. The authors' recommendations are aimed at improvement of the list of local issues and powers fixed with municipalities in the intraurban areas, and territorial and financial grounds of local self/governance in cities of federal significance. The paper also considers the municipal aspect of organization of governance of the Moscow and St. Petersburg urban agglomerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Starodubrovskaya & Margarita Slavgorodskaya & Sergey Zhavoronkov, 2004. "Organization of Local Self Governance in the Cities of Federal Level," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 87P, pages 151-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:gai:rpaper:116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/rpaper/116Starodubrovskaya.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2003. "Russia : Development Policy Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 13874, The World Bank Group.
    2. Neil Brenner, 2000. "The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 361-378, June.
    3. World Bank, 2003. "Participation in Public Expenditure Systems : Participation in Public Expenditure Systems," World Bank Publications - Reports 11307, The World Bank Group.
    4. Bertaud, Alain & Renaud, Bertrand, 1997. "Socialist Cities without Land Markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 137-151, January.
    5. Bertaud, Alain & Renaud, Bertrand, 1995. "Cities without land markets : location and land use in the socialist city," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1477, The World Bank.
    6. Reuven Brenner, 1999. "Capital Markets And Democracy," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 11(4), pages 66-74, January.
    7. John T. Harvey, 1998. "The Institutional Economics of the International Economy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 247-250, March.
    8. World Bank, 2002. "Urban Transport in the Europe and Central Asia Region : World Bank Experience and Strategy," World Bank Publications - Reports 15094, The World Bank Group.
    9. Howe, Charles W., 2002. "Policy issues and institutional impediments in the management of groundwater: lessons from case studies," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 605-616, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calvin King Lam Chung & Jiang Xu, 2016. "Scale as both material and discursive: A view through China’s rescaling of urban planning system for environmental governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1404-1424, December.
    2. Koprencka, Luciana & Muharremi, Oltiana, 2010. "Land market in Albania: Unresolved property ownership rights," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 6(3), pages 1-4, October.
    3. Ubarevi?ien?, R?ta & van Ham, Maarten, 2016. "Population Decline in Lithuania: Who Lives in Declining Regions and Who Leaves?," IZA Discussion Papers 10160, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Dascher, Kristof, 2019. "Function Follows Form," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 131-140.
    5. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. World Bank, 2005. "Russian Federation : From Transition to Development, A Country Economic Memorandum for the Russian Federation," World Bank Publications - Reports 8628, The World Bank Group.
    7. Bertaud, Alain & Brueckner, Jan K., 2005. "Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-125, March.
    8. SHIDA, Yoshisada, 2021. "Does the Currency Crisis Veil the Impact of Economic Sanctions under an Authoritarian Regime? An Inquiry into Russia," RRC Working Paper Series 91, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    9. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    10. Elena Koncheva & Nikolay Zalesskiy, 2016. "Spatial Development of the Largest Russian Cities During the Post-Soviet Period: Orienting Towards Transit or Maintaining Soviet Trends," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/URB/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Chengri Ding, 2004. "Urban Spatial Development in the Land Policy Reform Era: Evidence from Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1889-1907, September.
    12. Guiqing Yang & Liyao Wang & Huang Huang, 2024. "Characteristics of Urban–Rural Integration at the County-Scale Interface: The Case of Linqu County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, November.
    13. E. A. Kolomak, 2022. "The Contradictory Impacts of Inhomogeneous Market Potential on the Development of Russian Cities and Towns," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 261-270, September.
    14. Phoebe Koundouri & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2004. "Estimating accounting prices for common pool natural resources: A distance function approach," DEOS Working Papers 0405, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    15. Shanxia Sun & Juan P. Sesmero & Karina Schoengold, 2016. "The role of common pool problems in irrigation inefficiency: a case study in groundwater pumping in Mexico," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 117-127, January.
    16. Wasantha Athukorala & Clevo Wilson, 2012. "Groundwater overuse and farm-level technical inefficiency: evidence from Sri Lanka," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 279, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    17. Eugene J. McCann, 2004. "Urban Political Economy Beyond the 'Global City'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(12), pages 2315-2333, November.
    18. Jill Wigle, 2010. "Social Relations, Property and ‘Peripheral’ Informal Settlement: The Case of Ampliación San Marcos, Mexico City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 411-436, February.
    19. Urmi Sengupta, 2013. "Inclusive Development? A State-Led Land Development Model in New Town, Kolkata," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 357-376, April.
    20. Pauline M McGuirk, 2004. "State, Strategy, and Scale in the Competitive City: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Governance of ‘Global Sydney’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(6), pages 1019-1043, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Self Governance; Federal Level;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gai:rpaper:116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksei Astakhov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gaidaru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.