IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gai/recdev/r21119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revision of Developing Country Status Determination Criterias
[Пересмотр Критериев Присвоения Статуса Развивающейся Страны]

Author

Listed:
  • Bagdasaryan Kniaz

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The article examines the recent practice of revision by leading developed countries, primarily the United States, of criteria for determining the status of developing countries. The possibility of such a practice is explained by the lack of generally recognized criteria on this issue at the level of international organizations, including the WTO. In the logic of modern trade wars, the United States uses this gap as a tool of trade policy, while creating a new form of struggle for international competitiveness. The article was written based on the RANEPA state assignment research programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagdasaryan Kniaz, 2021. "Revision of Developing Country Status Determination Criterias [Пересмотр Критериев Присвоения Статуса Развивающейся Страны]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 11, pages 33-38, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:r21119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/recdev/r21119.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bagdasarian K. & Pakhomov A., 2016. "Issues Regarding Eaeu Members’ Participation In The Wto Activity," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 11, pages 52-58, November.
    2. Djalita Fialho & Peter A. G. Van Bergeijk, 2017. "The Proliferation of Developing Country Classifications," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 99-115, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagdasaryan Kniaz, 2021. "Пересмотр Критериев Присвоения Статуса Развивающейся Страны," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 11, pages 33-38, November.
    2. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2019. "From International to Global Development: New Geographies of 21st Century Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 347-378, March.
    3. Vic Benuyenah, 2024. "Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3100-3121, March.
    4. Li, C. & van Bergeijk, P.A.G., 2016. "Do natural disasters stimulate international trade?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 622, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    5. Cícero, Vinicius Curti & Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, 2023. "Functional distribution of income as a determinant of importing behavior: An empirical analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 393-405.
    6. Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2023. "Country differentiation in the global environmental context: Who is ‘developing’ and according to what?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 253-269, September.
    7. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic status; developing countries; tariff preferences; WTO; revision of usual criterias; new trade rules;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F19 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:r21119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olga Beloborodova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gaidaru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.