IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fru/finjrn/200304p60-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Initiative Budgeting in the Regions of the Russian Federation (Exemplified by the Sverdlovsk Region)

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina V. Derbeneva

    (Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Yekaterinburg 620014, Russian Federation; Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russian Federation)

  • Ekaterina А. Zakharchuk

    (Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Yekaterinburg 620014, Russian Federation)

  • Alexey F. Pasynkov

    (Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Yekaterinburg 620014, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article discusses the experience of implementing the practice of proactive budgeting in the Russian regions. A review of Russian and foreign experience has revealed that a unique experience and a special form of budgeting based on public participation are taking shape in our country, and therefore, comparative analysis of the global and domestic effectiveness of such practices is significantly impeded. In this regard, it is shown that in domestic literature there has not yet been a single approach to assessing the effectiveness of initiative budgeting. Exemplified by the Sverdlovsk region, the experience of implementing proactive budgeting in the regions is considered, and specific features of initiative budgeting practice implementation as well as the structure and directions of the use of financial resources in the municipalities of the regions are identified. In the framework of proactive budgeting, the special experience of Yekaterinburg is highlighted, which has been developing proactive budgeting in the municipality at its own expense, without co-financing from the regional budget, since 2019. In conclusion, the general problems and features of municipalities in the Sverdlovsk region that arise during the implementation of initiative budgeting practices are outlined. The main factors of successful inclusion of municipalities in initiative budgeting programs are the initiative of local authorities and the standard of living of the territory’s population.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina V. Derbeneva & Ekaterina А. Zakharchuk & Alexey F. Pasynkov, 2020. "Development of Initiative Budgeting in the Regions of the Russian Federation (Exemplified by the Sverdlovsk Region)," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 60-75, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:200304:p:60-75
    DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2020-3-60-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2020/3/statii/04_3_2020_v12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-3-60-75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. V. Chugunov & V. A. Karachay, 2019. "Electronic Participation and Participatory Budgeting as Feedback Mechanisms in the Smart City Model," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 11.
    2. Kristina G. Kachalkina & Eldar R. Nurtdinov & Nelly Sh. Roze, 2018. "Development of Forms and Methods of Initiative Budgeting Realization in Republic of Bashkortostan," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 123-131, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      initiative budgeting; Sverdlovsk region; municipalities; co-financing; self-imposition of citizens;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
      • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories
      • H79 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:200304:p:60-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gennady Ageev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frigvru.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.