IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/for/ijafaa/y2016i40p12-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bias-Variance Trade-offs in Demand Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Katsikopoulos
  • Aris Syntetos

Abstract

In supply-chain forecasting, we have traditionally used point forecasts to predict the mean level of demand per time period. In doing so, we place emphasis on finding forecast methods that minimize bias in the forecasts, because forecast bias ultimately leads to either excessive or inadequate inventory levels. This emphasis on avoiding bias, however, can neglect variability in the forecasts. Konstantinos and Aris explain in this article that the neglect of forecast variability is a mistake, because forecast variance is a factor - along with, and of the same importance as, bias - that determines the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of a forecast method, which is often (and possibly too often) used to set safety stocks. The authors show that, in selecting a forecast method, there is in fact a trade-off between forecast bias and forecast variance. Their provocative takeaway is that simple methods tend to have large bias but low variance, while complexity reduces bias at the expense of increasing variance. Hence, simple forecasting methods, even if their resulting forecasts are biased, might be preferable to complex methods for minimizing forecast error. Most generally, the right amount of complexity should be sought. Copyright International Institute of Forecasters, 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Katsikopoulos & Aris Syntetos, 2016. "Bias-Variance Trade-offs in Demand Forecasting," Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, International Institute of Forecasters, issue 40, pages 12-19, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2016:i:40:p:12-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight.forecasters.org/shop/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V. & Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2018. "When should we use simple decision models? A synthesis of various research strands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 17-25.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2016:i:40:p:12-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Gilliland (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.