IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/for/ijafaa/y2014i32p34-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Forecasting Methods Reduce Avoidable Error? Evidence from Forecasting Competitions

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Morlidge

Abstract

The set of M-competitions Ð comparing the forecasting accuracy of two dozen common time series methods Ð is a landmark in our understanding of how different methods fare on a variety of data types. For example, one common procedure, the trend line extrapolation available in Excel, emerged as the least accurate of all, and probably should be considered a must to avoid. Yet, as Steve Morlidge tells us here, the implications for practitioners, especially demand forecasters, are not widely understood and quite possibly overlooked by most. Steve not only summarizes the key implications, he also uses a selection of data from the M3-Competition Ð the most recent (year 2000) and most comprehensive Ð to shed additional light on the bounds of forecastability: the best (and worst) forecast accuracy we can expect to achieve. Copyright International Institute of Forecasters, 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Morlidge, 2014. "Do Forecasting Methods Reduce Avoidable Error? Evidence from Forecasting Competitions," Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, International Institute of Forecasters, issue 32, pages 34-39, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2014:i:32:p:34-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight.forecasters.org/shop/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2014:i:32:p:34-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Gilliland (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.