IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fma/fmanag/danielson.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Return-Stages Valuation Model and the Expectations Within a Firm's P/B and P/E Ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Morris Danielson
  • Thomas Dowdell

Abstract

The return-stages model can quantify the expectations facing a firm from its price-to-book (P/B) and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios. We illustrate two implications of the model. First, a firm’s P/B and P/E ratios can predict the future cash flow pattern earned by a firm. Second, the operating performance consistent with a given stock return differs across four groups of firms: Growth Firms, Mature Firms, Turnaround Firms, and Declining Firms. Our results imply that a firm’s stock return depends, in part, on how its operating performance compares to the expectations defined by its P/B and P/E ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris Danielson & Thomas Dowdell, 2001. "The Return-Stages Valuation Model and the Expectations Within a Firm's P/B and P/E Ratios," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 30(2), Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:danielson
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Yuan, Yuan & Chiang, Thomas & Nandha, Mohan, 2010. "Symmetric and asymmetric US sector return volatilities in presence of oil, financial and economic risks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 3922-3932, August.
    2. Manas Mayur, 2015. "Relationship between Price–Earnings Ratios and Stock Value in an Emerging Market," Paradigm, , vol. 19(1), pages 52-64, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:danielson. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Courtney Connors (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.