IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedreb/99081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Whom It May Concern: Demographic Differences in Letters of Recommendation

Author

Abstract

Letters of recommendation from faculty advisors play a critical role in the job market for Ph.D. economists. At their best, they can convey important qualitative information about a candidate, including the candidate's potential to generate impactful research. But at their worst, these letters offer a subjective view of the candidate that can be susceptible to conscious or unconscious bias. There may also be similarity or affinity bias, a particularly difficult issue for the economics profession, where most faculty members are White men. In this post, we draw on our recent working paper to describe how recommendation letters differ by the gender, race or ethnicity of the job candidate and how these differences are related to early career outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Beverly Hirtle & Anna Kovner, 2024. "To Whom It May Concern: Demographic Differences in Letters of Recommendation," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 24(35), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedreb:99081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_brief/2024/eb_24-35
    File Function: Briefing
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; Employment and labor markets;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedreb:99081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Pascasio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbrius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.