IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedmrr/y2002ijunp12-1540-43nv16,no.2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A punishing debate: does the death penalty deter homicide? New economic studies seek the answer to an age-old question

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Clement

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Clement, 2002. "A punishing debate: does the death penalty deter homicide? New economic studies seek the answer to an age-old question," The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 16(Jun), pages 12-15,40-43.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedmrr:y:2002:i:jun:p:12-1540-43:n:v16,no.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/pub_display.cfm?id=3408
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donohue III, John J. & Wolfers, Justin, 2006. "Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate," IZA Discussion Papers 1949, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crime; Law enforcement;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedmrr:y:2002:i:jun:p:12-1540-43:n:v16,no.2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jannelle Ruswick (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfrbmus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.