IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedlrv/y2000ijulp11-30nv.82no.4x1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward WTO 2000: a Seattle odyssey; commentary

Author

Listed:
  • T. N. Srinivasan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • T. N. Srinivasan, 2000. "Toward WTO 2000: a Seattle odyssey; commentary," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 11-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:2000:i:jul:p:11-30:n:v.82no.4:x:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/00/07/0007ts.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levy, Philip I & Srinivasan, T N, 1996. "Regionalism and the (Dis)advantage of Dispute-Settlement Access," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(2), pages 93-98, May.
    2. Brown, Fred & Whalley, John, 1980. "General Equilibrium Evaluations of Tariff-Cutting Proposals in the Tokyo Round and Comparisons with More Extensive Liberalisation of World Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(363), pages 838-866, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Norman & Heinrich H. Nax, 2011. "Leading the Way: Coalitional Stability in Technological Cooperation & Sequential Climate Policy," Economics Series Working Papers 585, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. L.J. Kimbell & G.W. Harrison, 1982. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Regional Fiscal Incidence," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 82-06, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Koushik Das & Pinaki Chakraborti, 2014. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Strategic Trade: A Computable General Equilibrium Model for India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 165-181, July.
    4. Bown, Chad, 2007. "Developing Countries and Enforcement of Trade Agreements: Why Dispute Settlement Is Not Enough," CEPR Discussion Papers 6459, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Mordechal Kreinin & Elias Dinopoulos, 1995. "Protection of industry," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 179-196, April.
    6. Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "Alternative Approaches to Measuring the Cost of Protection," International Trade 0308002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2006. "Reciprocity and the hidden constitution of world trade," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 133-163, September.
    8. Koushik Das, 2014. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Strategic Trade," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 49(3), pages 219-245, August.
    9. Ossa, Ralph & Staiger, Robert W. & Sykes, Alan O., 2023. "Standing in international investment and trade disputes," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Bernard Hoekman, 2015. "Trade Agreements and International Regulatory Cooperation in a Supply Chain World," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/04, European University Institute.
    11. Gary R. Saxonhouse, 1993. "What Does Japanese Trade Structure Tell Us about Japanese Trade Policy?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 21-43, Summer.
    12. Mavroidis, Petros C., 2013. "Bite the Bullet: Trade Retaliation, EU Jurisprudence and the Law and Economics of ?Taking One for the Team?," CEPR Discussion Papers 9496, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. V.L. Rao, 1985. "New Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 88-93, October.
    14. Dan Kovenock & Marie Thursby, 1992. "Gatt, Dispute Settlement And Cooperation," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 151-170, July.
    15. Gertz, Geoffrey & Jandhyala, Srividya & Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, 2018. "Legalization, diplomacy, and development: Do investment treaties de-politicize investment disputes?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 239-252.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    World Trade Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:2000:i:jul:p:11-30:n:v.82no.4:x:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Scott St. Louis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbslus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.