IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedgrb/y2001imarp103-131nv.87no.3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetary policy report to the Congress, February 17, 2001

Author

Listed:
  • anonymous

Abstract

When the Federal Reserve submitted its previous Monetary Policy Report to the Congress, in July 2000, tentative signs of a moderation in the growth of economic activity were emerging after several quarters of extraordinarily rapid expansion. Indications that the expansion had moderated from its earlier rapid pace gradually accumulated during the summer and into the autumn. For a time, this downshifting of growth seemed to have left the economy expanding at a pace roughly in line with that of its potential. Over the last few months of the year, however, growth slowed even more, although the dimensions of the slowdown were obscured for a time by the usual lags in the receipt of economic data. Spending on business capital, which had been rising rapidly for several years, flattened abruptly in the fourth quarter. Consumers clamped down on their outlays for motor vehicles and other durables, the stocks of which also had climbed to high levels. Manufacturers adjusted production quickly to counter a buildup in inventories. Rising concern about slower growth and worker layoffs contributed to a sharp deterioration of consumer confidence. In response to the accumulating weakness, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered the intended interest rate on federal funds 1/2 percentage point on January 3 of this year. The FOMC lowered the rate again, by the same amount, at its meeting on January 31. ; The less restrictive conditions in financial markets, and the underlying strengths of the economy, should lead to a rebound in economic growth. The most notable of the underlying strengths is the remarkable step-up in the growth of structural productivity since the mid-1990s, which seems to be closely related to the spread of new technologies. The impressive performance of productivity and the accompanying environment of low and stable underlying inflation suggest that the longer-run outlook for the economy is still quite favorable, even though downside risks may remain prominent in the period immediately ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • anonymous, 2001. "Monetary policy report to the Congress, February 17, 2001," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Mar, pages 103-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedgrb:y:2001:i:mar:p:103-131:n:v.87no.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2001/0301lead.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aoki, Kosuke & Proudman, James & Vlieghe, Gertjan, 2004. "House prices, consumption, and monetary policy: a financial accelerator approach," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 414-435, October.
    2. Dawid J. van Lill, 2017. "Changes in the Liquidity Effect Over Time: Evidence from Four Monetary Policy Regimes," Working Papers 704, Economic Research Southern Africa.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedgrb:y:2001:i:mar:p:103-131:n:v.87no.3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.