IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2016-098006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peculiarit? e potenzialit? della misurazione dei costi nella diagnostica per immagini

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Pilonato
  • Antonella Cugini

Abstract

Le aziende sanitarie private accreditate gestiscono peculiari aspetti di misurazione dei costi, fondamentali da conoscere e gestire al fine di valutare la sostenibilit? economica dei servizi offerti. I loro ricavi sono costituiti in parte da rimborsi definiti a livello regionale e in parte da introiti da prestazioni il cui prezzo ? definito in completa autonomia. Il paper analizza i sistemi di misurazione dei costi che, fornendo una pi? corretta informazione dei costi unitari delle prestazioni erogate soprattutto per una migliore allocazione dei costi di struttura, possono supportare anche i processi di pricing. Il caso di studio evidenzia il valore del sistema basato sulle attivit? (ABC) per un?azienda che opera nel settore della diagnostica per immagini, e come esso consenta una pi? precisa valutazione dei mix di servizi offerti, delle tariffe di rimborso e dei prezzi fissati.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Pilonato & Antonella Cugini, 2016. "Peculiarit? e potenzialit? della misurazione dei costi nella diagnostica per immagini," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(98), pages 105-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2016-098006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=57669&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Arnaboldi & Irvine Lapsley, 2004. "Modern Costing Innovations and Legitimation: A Health Care Study," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 40(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Oleg DEJNEGA, 2011. "Method Time Driven Activity Based Costing €“ Literature Review," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 5(1(15)/ Sp), pages 7-15.
    3. Demeere, Nathalie & Stouthuysen, Kristof & Roodhooft, Filip, 2009. "Time-driven activity-based costing in an outpatient clinic environment: Development, relevance and managerial impact," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 296-304, October.
    4. Francesco Paolucci, 2011. "Health Care Financing and Insurance," Developments in Health Economics and Public Policy, Springer, number 978-3-642-10794-8, March.
    5. Kaplan, Robert S., 1986. "The role for empirical research in management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(4-5), pages 429-452, July.
    6. Ralph Adler & André M. Everett & Marilyn Waldron, 2000. "Advanced management accounting techniques in manufacturing: utilization, benefits, and barriers to implementation," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 131-150, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurent Mériade, 2024. "How to Analyze the Practical Relevance of Costing Methods? The Example of Hospital Cost Accounting in France," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(4), pages 816-851, December.
    2. Cristina Campanale & Lino Cinquini & Andrea Tenucci, 2014. "Il Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing per la gestione dei costi in logica di spending review: riflessioni da un caso di azienda ospedaliera," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(91), pages 9-42.
    3. Svitlana Firsova, 2017. "Examining Institutional Content Of The Balanced Scorecard: Logics And Translations In Ukrainian Business Environment," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 8(2).
    4. repec:vul:omefvu:v:9:y:2017:i:2:id:229 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Véronique Nabelsi & Véronique Plouffe, 2019. "Breast cancer treatment pathway improvement using time‐driven activity‐based costing," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1736-1746, October.
    6. Anne Fortin & Hamid Haffaf & Chantal Viger, 2007. "The Measurement of Success of Activity‐Based Costing and Its Determinants: A Study within Canadian Federal Government Organizations/L'évaluation Du Succès De La Comptabilité Par Activités Et Ses Déter," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 231-262, August.
    7. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jorgensen, Brian, 2006. "Activity-based costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization--A case study and beyond," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 252-270, September.
    8. Walid Cheffi, 2008. "Etude Des Roles De La Comptabilite De Gestion Pour Les Managers : Le Cas D'Un Grand Groupe Automobile," Post-Print halshs-00522472, HAL.
    9. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shang-Yu Lai & Chu-Lun Hsieh, 2023. "Exploring the impact of different carbon emission cost models on corporate profitability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 41-74, March.
    10. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    12. Lai Ken Tan & Matthew Egan, 2018. "The Public Accountability Value of a Triple Bottom Line Approach to Performance Reporting in the Water Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 235-250, June.
    13. Allan Hansen, 2011. "Relating performative and ostensive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 108-138, June.
    14. Deryl Northcott & Necia France, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard in New Zealand Health Sector Performance Management: Dissemination to Diffusion," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(37), pages 34-46, November.
    15. José Luis Esparza-Aguilar & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema & Antonio Duréndez, 2016. "The effect of accounting information systems on the performance of Mexican micro, small and medium-sized family firms," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(5), pages 1104-1120, October.
    16. Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Antonio Duréndez & José António C. Santos, 2019. "Family Management and Firm Performance in Family SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Management Control Systems and Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Baxter, Jane & Chua, Wai Fong, 2003. "Alternative management accounting research--whence and whither," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 97-126.
    18. Helen Irvine, 2007. "Corporate Creep: An Institutional View Of Consultancies in a Non-Profit Organisation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 13-25, March.
    19. Zimmerman, Jerold L., 2001. "Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 411-427, December.
    20. Adeeb Abdulwahab Al-Hebry & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, 2017. "A Critical Study of Cost Approaches in the Accounting Thought: Conceptual Study," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 105-112.
    21. Zuzana Špacírová & David Epstein & Leticia García-Mochón & Joan Rovira & Antonio Olry de Labry Lima & Jaime Espín, 2020. "A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(4), pages 529-542, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2016-098006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.