IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/macoma/vhtml10.3280-maco2015-001006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La valutazione della ricerca tramite indici bibliometrici: riflessioni da una prospettiva economico-aziendale

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Giuliani
  • Stefano Marasca

Abstract

In dependence of the lack of resources and the consequent need to manage better the allocation process, there is a growing interest regarding the issue of research evaluation. In particular, it is possible to notice a more frequent use of bibliometrics and citation-based indexes (impact factor, h-index, eigenfactor, etc.). The aim of this paper is to analyse to what extent citation-based indexes can be used to evaluate the research in business economics. In order to achieve the above-mentioned aim, the paper proposes a review of the main indexes analyzing their pros and cons and then it tries to draw some critical conclusions with reference to the citation behavior and to the used data base. In the last section, the paper proposes some reflections regarding the use of citation-based indexes for evaluating the research in business economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Giuliani & Stefano Marasca, 2015. "La valutazione della ricerca tramite indici bibliometrici: riflessioni da una prospettiva economico-aziendale," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 133-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2015-001006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=53803&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulio Greco, 2014. "Una comparazione internazionale tra i sistemi di valutazione della ricerca scientifica," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 87-99.
    2. Gianfranco Rusconi, 2014. "La valutazione della ricerca scientifica. Alcuni spunti di riflessione dopo le recenti esperienze in Italia," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 73-85.
    3. Antonella Paolini & Alberto Quagli, 2013. "Una riflessione sugli strumenti bibliometrici per la valutazione della ricerca e una proposta: il real impact factor," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 115-128.
    4. Pablo D. Batista & Mônica G. Campiteli & Osame Kinouchi, 2006. "Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(1), pages 179-189, July.
    5. Johan Bollen & Herbert Van de Sompel, 2008. "Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage‐based impact metrics," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(1), pages 136-149, January.
    6. Luciano Marchi & Stefano Marasca & Marco Giuliani, 2013. "Valutare la ricerca nella prospettiva europea e internazionale: prime riflessioni," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 99-113.
    7. Lutz Bornmann & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2005. "Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 65(3), pages 391-392, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2017. "Some notes about financial accounting research: Research methodology, epistemological approaches and practical implications," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 43-49.
    2. Stefano Azzali & Luca Fornaciari & Tatiana Mazza, 2018. "Trends in Italian Accounting and Management Research by topical areas," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2 Suppl.), pages 157-181.
    3. Andrea Francesconi & Enrico Guarini & Francesca Magli, 2020. "Distorsioni nel sistema di accountability delle Universit?: analisi di un caso," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 59-86.
    4. Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini & Francesco Paolone, 2018. "A Roadmap for Performance Measurement in Smarter Universities," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2 Suppl.), pages 113-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luciano Marchi, 2018. "Quale metodologia di ricerca sulle tematiche di Management Control?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 5-10.
    2. Stefano Azzali & Luca Fornaciari & Tatiana Mazza, 2018. "Trends in Italian Accounting and Management Research by topical areas," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2 Suppl.), pages 157-181.
    3. Luciano Marchi, 2021. "Temi e medodologie di ricerca nell?area Management Control: stato dell?arte e prospettive," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 165-170.
    4. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2017. "Some notes about financial accounting research: Research methodology, epistemological approaches and practical implications," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 43-49.
    5. Natalia Aversano & Francesca Manes Rossi & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2017. "I sistemi di misurazione della performance nelle universit?: considerazioni critiche sul sistema italiano," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 15-36.
    6. Manuela Lucchese & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2020. "Il risk management approach nelle Universit? italiane: prime riflessioni su vincoli e opportunit?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 111-136.
    7. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    8. Parul Khurana & Kiran Sharma, 2022. "Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4483-4498, August.
    9. Thomas R. Anderson & Robin K. S. Hankin & Peter D. Killworth, 2008. "Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 577-588, September.
    10. Lorna Wildgaard & Jesper W. Schneider & Birger Larsen, 2014. "A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 125-158, October.
    11. Eva Lillquist & Sheldon Green, 2010. "The discipline dependence of citation statistics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 749-762, September.
    12. Juan Imperial & Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro, 2007. "Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 271-282, May.
    13. Miguel A. García-Pérez, 2009. "A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 779-785, December.
    14. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    15. Antonis Sidiropoulos & Dimitrios Katsaros & Yannis Manolopoulos, 2007. "Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 253-280, August.
    16. Ole Ellegaard, 2018. "The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 181-202, July.
    17. J. W. Fedderke, 2013. "The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 177-206, November.
    18. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    19. Rodrigo Costas & María Bordons, 2008. "Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(2), pages 267-288, November.
    20. Vieira, E.S. & Gomes, J.A.N.F., 2010. "A research impact indicator for institutions," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 581-590.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2015-001006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.