IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/frfrfr/vhtml10.3280-fr2024-001001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the academic accounting research model

Author

Listed:
  • Mark C. Dawkins

Abstract

Current academic incentive systems primarily reward accounting faculty for publishing research articles in elite journals. Faculty members decide what research questions to address and what research methods to use to investigate those re-search questions. Regulators, accounting service firms, and practicing accountants have little input about which research questions are investigated, how the research is conducted, and how and where the results are disseminated. This current ap-proach often results in financial accounting and auditing research that is not rele-vant to the practice of accounting. This commentary proposes a market-driven approach to the conduct of financial and auditing accounting research similar to that used in the medical sciences where pharmaceutical companies and govern-mental entities determine the most pressing medical issues. Besides university-sponsored research, faculty members in the medical sciences apply for grants to support research targeted at improving the treatment of these medical issues, and relevant research findings are quickly disseminated through highly-regarded peer-reviewed outlets such as The New England Journal of Medicine, The Journal of the American Medical Association, the British Medical Journal, and The Lancet so doctors and other medical professionals may quickly implement them into practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark C. Dawkins, 2024. "Rethinking the academic accounting research model," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(1), pages 5-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2024-001001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=75758&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhoda Brown, 2009. "Revisiting the expectations gaps after 15 years," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 92-95, September.
    2. repec:eme:jaar00:09675420910984655 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alexsandro Broedel & Eduardo da Silva Flores, 2021. "Accounting Research: The False Choice between Methodological Consistency and Practical Relevance," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(6), pages 210119-2101.
    4. Chan, Kam C. & Chan, Kam C. & Seow, Gim S. & Tam, Kinsun, 2009. "Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 875-885, August.
    5. Thomas R. Dyckman & Stephen A. Zeff, 2015. "Accounting Research: Past, Present, and Future," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(4), pages 511-524, December.
    6. Tom Lee, 1997. "The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 11-30, March.
    7. Christopher Ittner & David Larcker, 2002. "Empirical managerial accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 787-794.
    8. Kenneth A. Merchant, 2012. "Making management accounting research more useful," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(3), pages 334-356, November.
    9. Rhoda Brown, 2009. "Revisiting the expectations gaps after 15 years," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 92-95, September.
    10. Kym Fraser & Benedict Sheehy, 2020. "Abundant Publications but Minuscule Impact: The Irrelevance of Academic Accounting Research on Practice and the Profession," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-36, October.
    11. Mary E. Barth, 2015. "Financial Accounting Research, Practice, and Financial Accountability," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(4), pages 499-510, December.
    12. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Zimmerman, Jerold L., 2001. "Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 411-427, December.
    14. Bonner, Sarah E. & Hesford, James W. & Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark, 2006. "The most influential journals in academic accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 663-685, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    2. Christoph Endenich & Michael Brandau & Andreas Hoffjan, 2011. "Two Decades of Research on Comparative Management Accounting – Achievements and Future Directions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(4), pages 365-382, December.
    3. Kym Fraser & Benedict Sheehy, 2020. "Abundant Publications but Minuscule Impact: The Irrelevance of Academic Accounting Research on Practice and the Profession," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-36, October.
    4. Jana Fibírová, 2008. "The Competitive Advantage of Management Accounting [Konkurenční výhoda manažerského účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2), pages 78-90.
    5. Konstantinos Eleftheriou & Patroklos Patsoulis & Michael Polemis, 2023. "Convergence among academic journals in accounting: a note," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1055-1069, February.
    6. Christoph Pelger & Markus Grottke, 2017. "Research diversity in accounting doctoral education: survey results from the German-speaking countries," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 307-336, October.
    7. Guthrie, Cynthia P. & Everett, John O. & Vijayakumar, Jayaraman & Olds, Philip R., 2012. "Evaluating faculty publications in accounting Ph.D. programs: The Author Affiliation Index as an alternative," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 290-306.
    8. Wai Ching Poon & Gareth D. Leeves, 2017. "Is there gender gap unequivocally? Evidence from research output 1958–2008," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1687-1701, June.
    9. Maria-Victoria Uribe-Bohorquez & Juan-Camilo Rivera-Ordóñez & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2023. "Gender disparities in accounting academia: analysis from the lens of publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 3827-3865, July.
    10. Alper Erserim, 2016. "Intellectual Structure of Accounting Research: A Historical Review on the Journal of Accounting Organization Society," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-1, May.
    11. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S.O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2011. "Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 59-71, April.
    12. S. Douglas Beets & Andrea S. Kelton & Bruce R. Lewis, 2015. "An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 315-332, January.
    13. José M. Merigó & Jian-Bo Yang, 2017. "Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(1), pages 71-100, March.
    14. Thomas Hemmer & Eva Labro, 2008. "On the Optimal Relation between the Properties of Managerial and Financial Reporting Systems," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1209-1240, December.
    15. José Alonso Borba & Alessanderson Jacó Carvalho & Denize Demarche Minatti Ferreira & Fábio Minatto, 2021. "Scopes of accounting journals and published papers: what do they signalize?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5665-5685, July.
    16. Rajat Deb, 2019. "Accounting Theory Coherence Revisited," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(1), pages 36-57, February.
    17. Sharad Asthana & Steven Balsam, 2012. "Market for Accounting Faculty This paper addresses compensation of a group of individuals of particular interest to the target audience – accounting faculty. We observe that salary increases with publ," Working Papers 0003, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    18. Endenich, Christoph & Trapp, Rouven, 2018. "Signaling effects of scholarly profiles – The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 4-23.
    19. Matthew M. Wieland & Mark C. Dawkins & Michael T. Dugan, 2016. "Assessing the Elite Publication Benefits of Academic Pedigree: A Joint Examination of PhD Institution and Employment Institution," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 269-309, December.
    20. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2024-001001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.