IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/frfrfr/vhtml10.3280-fr2015-001001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directive 2013/34/EU, Article 6 An Analysis and some Implications. A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • David Alexander

Abstract

This research note analyses a number of implications of Article 6 of the new EU accounting Directive. Two avenues are explored in some detail. The first is the meaning, or non-meaning, of the measurement basis provisions of the Directive, covered in Article 6 with derogations in Articles 7 and 8, in the context of the previously declared intention to no longer allow the use of current replacement cost. The second relates to the extraordinary flexibility, indeed confusion, relating to the substance/form distinction, both in principle from Article 6, and by example relating to consolidation in Article 22. The Directive is argued to be sufficiently incompetent, ambivalent, and at times internally inconsistent, to allow a considerable degree of de facto carte blanche to Member States. Perhaps it should be called the anti-harmonisation directive.

Suggested Citation

  • David Alexander, 2015. "Directive 2013/34/EU, Article 6 An Analysis and some Implications. A Research Note," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 5-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2015-001001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=54544&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Alexander & Eva Eberhartinger, 2010. "The European Union Endorsement Process for International Financial Reporting Standards: A Telos-Based Analysis," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 37-62, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Girella & Mario Abela & Elisa Rita Ferrari, 2018. "Conceptual shifts in accounting: Transplanting the notion of boundary from financial to non-financial reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 133-175.
    2. Anguiano-Santos, Carlos & Salazar-Ordóñez, Melania & Tornel-Vázquez, Rossana & Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario, 2024. "Sustainability reporting harmonisation? A utopian endeavour for European agri-food companies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 354-368.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Alexander & Anne Le Manh-Béna & Olivier J. Ramond, 2013. "Can the conceptual framework be all things to all (wo)men?," Post-Print hal-00991959, HAL.
    2. Mora, Araceli, 2018. "The role of Politics and Economics in the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption/La influencia de la política y la economía en la adopción de las Normas Internacionales de Informa," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 407-428, Mayo.
    3. Carien Van Mourik & Peter Walton, 2018. "The European IFRS Endorsement Process – in Search of a Single Voice," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Crawford, L. & Ferguson, J. & Helliar, C.V. & Power, D.M., 2014. "Control over accounting standards within the European Union: The political controversy surrounding the adoption of IFRS 8," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 304-318.
    5. Mario Abela & Araceli Mora, 2012. "Understanding the Consequences of Accounting Standards in Europe: The Role of EFRAG," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 147-170, December.
    6. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske, 2016. "Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 129-168, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:frfrfr:v:html10.3280/fr2015-001001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.