Author
Listed:
- Bruno Bises
- Gianluca Lagan?
- Flavia D'Oro
Abstract
The proper size of local jurisdictions is one of the problems the economic theory of fiscal federalism deals with. On theoretical grounds, the economic literature identifies the benefits and costs of larger vs. smaller jurisdictions mainly in economies of scale and differences in population preferences, respectively. Gains and losses due to the tax-transfer mechanism are often also considered. In practice, any decentralised country may face the two opposite phenomena of small jurisdictions merging to found a larger one and/or the communities belonging to a single political-administrative unit separating so as to give rise to two (or more) smaller jurisdictions. In this paper the latter case is analysed with special reference to the possible splitting of the Italian province of Reggio Calabria and the founding of a new province in its eastern part. The mentioned approaches are jointly used so as to provide a unitary cost-benefit evaluation. Firstly, the efficiency gains and losses from the province splitting are considered. By using indicators of the population income, wealth and consumption, of demographic and education composition and of political opinions, the gains in preference homogeneity are tested also through the cluster methodology and a spatial analysis. Then the economies of scale are analysed with respect to the administrative offices, and the additional political and bureaucratic costs are inferred using data from the mother-province budget. Finally, an analysis of financial sustainability of the new province is accomplished, through a simulation of its budget and the calculation of fiscal and financial indicators. While no gains in terms of better correspondence of the new province decisions to local preferences may be hypothesized as a consequence of the separation from the old province, higher costs due to the doubling of political and administrative apparatus and a worsening of fiscal and financial situations should be expected. The well known result that the secession from large jurisdictions comes out in net losses for poorer areas appears to be confirmed.
Suggested Citation
Bruno Bises & Gianluca Lagan? & Flavia D'Oro, 2009.
"Costi e benefici del distacco da una giurisdizione locale: il caso di una provincia,"
ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(5-6), pages 17-44.
Handle:
RePEc:fan:epepep:v:html10.3280/ep2009-005002
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:epepep:v:html10.3280/ep2009-005002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=16 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.