IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/aimaim/vhtml10.3280-aim2016-001004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Propriet? agraria, territorio e inclusione

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Ferrari

Abstract

Il contributo si interroga se alcune forme di propriet? agraria contemplino un diritto ad essere inclusi. Tradizionalmente il diritto di propriet? ? associato allo jus excludendi; la possibilit? di un diritto ad essere inclusi ?, al contrario, poco consi-derata. Dopo aver analizzato il ruolo dello jus excludendi, sottolineando come la dottrina agraristica abbia contribuito significativamente ad individuarne i limiti, il contributo introduce il diritto ad essere inclusi, distinguendo tra una versione debo-le e una forte. Mentre la prima si risolve in una semplice riproposizione del discorso sui limiti della propriet?, la seconda, prevedendo la possibilit? che terzi abbiano il diritto di divenire co-titolari di una risorsa altrui, ha carattere maggiormente in-novativo. La propriet? agraria contempla alcuni casi in cui esiste un diritto ad esse-re inclusi in senso forte. In particolare, il contributo offre due esempi: le propriet? collettive agrarie e la disciplina di Dop e Igp. In entrambi le ipotesi, l?analisi indica come la versione forte del diritto ad essere inclusi sia giustificata in ragione della centralit? del territorio e di esigenze di cooperazione.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Ferrari, 2016. "Propriet? agraria, territorio e inclusione," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 53-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:aimaim:v:html10.3280/aim2016-001004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=62056&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Jannarelli, 2007. "Il dibattito sulla propriet? privata negli anni Trenta del Novecento," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2007(1), pages 21-52.
    2. McCloskey, Donald N., 1972. "The Enclosure of Open Fields: Preface to a Study of Its Impact on the Efficiency of English Agriculture in the Eighteenth Century," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 15-35, March.
    3. Dagan, Hanoch, 2011. "Property: Values and Institutions," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199737864.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Barbezat, 2011. "The Economic History of European Growth," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 51, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Lambert, Thomas, 2021. "The Baran Ratio, Investment, and British Economic Growth and Investment," MPRA Paper 109546, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Stefano Fenoaltea, 1988. "Transaction Costs, Whig History, and the Common Fields," Politics & Society, , vol. 16(2-3), pages 171-240, June.
    4. Paolo Crosetto & Alexia Gaudeul & Gerhard Riener, 2012. "Partnerships, Imperfect Monitoring and Outside Options: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-052, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Nina Boberg-Fazlic & Markus Lampe & Pablo Martinelli Lasheras & Paul Sharp, 2020. "Winners and Losers from Enclosure: Evidence from Danish Land Inequality 1682-1895," Working Papers 0178, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    6. Francesco GUALA, 2010. "Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate," Departmental Working Papers 2010-23, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Lambert, Thomas, 2020. "Investment Expenditures and the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism," MPRA Paper 101396, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Reti, Kinga-Olga, 2019. "My land is my food: Exploring social function of large land deals using food security–land deals relation in five Eastern European countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 729-741.
    9. Antras, Pol & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2003. "Factor prices and productivity growth during the British industrial revolution," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 52-77, January.
    10. José L. Martínez González, 2019. "High Wages or Wages For Energy? An Alternative View of The British Case (1645-1700)," Working Papers 0158, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    11. Jaume Ventura & Hans-Joachim Voth, 2015. "Debt into Growth: How Sovereign Debt Accelerated the First Industrial Revolution," NBER Working Papers 21280, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Leite, Duarte N. & Afonso, Óscar & Silva, Sandra T., 2020. "The Two Revolutions, Landed Elites, And Education During The Industrial Revolution," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 1478-1511, September.
    13. Kopsidis, Michael & Wolf, Nikolaus, 2012. "Agricultural Productivity Across Prussia During the Industrial Revolution: A Thünen Perspective," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 634-670, August.
    14. McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen, 2009. "Creative Language, Creative Destruction, Creative Politics," MPRA Paper 22925, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Ian Keay & Cherie Metcalf, 2011. "Property Rights, Resource Access, and Long‐Run Growth," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 792-829, December.
    16. Runge, C. Ford & Defrancesco, Edi, 2006. "Exclusion, Inclusion, and Enclosure: Historical Commons and Modern Intellectual Property," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1713-1727, October.
    17. Lambert, Thomas, 2019. "Game of Thrones or Game of Class Struggle? Revisiting the Demise of Feudalism and the Dobb-Sweezy Debate," MPRA Paper 96741, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Mesbah Motamed & Raymond Florax & William Masters, 2014. "Agriculture, transportation and the timing of urbanization: Global analysis at the grid cell level," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 339-368, September.
    19. Lambert, Thomas, 2021. "Conjectures of English and UK Economic Surplus, Investment, Tax Revenues and Deficit Amounts from the 13th to the 19th Century," MPRA Paper 109080, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Goksel Armagan & Suleyman Nizam, 2012. "Productivity and efficiency scores of dairy farms: the case of Turkey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:aimaim:v:html10.3280/aim2016-001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=122 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.