IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eyd/eyjrnl/v19y2008i66p73-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Keynes Bir Marjinalist Midir?" Genel Teori'nin Mikro Temelleri

Author

Listed:
  • Zafer Barış GÜL

    (Ankara University)

Abstract

İktisat teorisi tarihi içinde, üzerinde belki de en fazla konuşulan kitaplardan biri Keynes'in 1936'da kaleme aldığı, "İstihdam, Faiz ve Paranın Genel Teorisi" 'dir. Eserin bu denli yoğun ilgiyle karşılanmasının bir nedeni, yazıldığı dönemde dünya ekonomisinin içine girdiği krize önerdiği reçetelerle kazandığı pratik önem ise, bir başka nedeni, bu dönemde iktisat teorisinin krizine son vermedeki becerisi olduğu ileri sürülür. Bu çerçevede çalışma kapsamında yapılmak istenen Genel Teori'nin konu edindiği meselelerin, yani, mal, para ve işgücü piyasalarına ilişkin argümanların açıklanmasında kullanılan teorik çerçevenin ve bununla birlikte ortaya çıkan yöntemin, Keynes öncesi neoklasik gelenek dikkate alınarak, tüm açıklığı ile su yüzüne çıkarılmasıdır. Keynes öncesi iktisadi düşüncede hakim bir paradigma konumunda olan "marjinalizm"in, Keynes'in Genel Teorisi içindeki yeri, karar alma süreçlerinde marjinalist tutumların önemi, bu bağlamda Keynes'in iktisat teorisi tarihi içinde, neoklasik paradigmadan ne ölçüde kopuş sergilediği ve ne ölçüde bu paradigmanın bir tamamlayıcısı olduğu, çalışmamızın ana tartışma uğraklarını oluşturacaktır. Sonuç olarak, Keynes'in yeni bir paradigma ortaya koyup koymadığı ya da eski paradigmanın bir tamamlayıcısı olarak mı kaldığı konusunda bir sonuca varmak amaçlanmaktadır.

Suggested Citation

  • Zafer Barış GÜL, 2008. ""Keynes Bir Marjinalist Midir?" Genel Teori'nin Mikro Temelleri," Ekonomik Yaklasim, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association, vol. 19(66), pages 73-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eyd:eyjrnl:v:19:y:2008:i:66:p:73-94
    DOI: 10.5455/ey.10660
    Note: [English Title] IS KEYNES A MARGINALIST?: MICROFOUNDATIONS OF THE GENERAL THEORY [English Abstract] J. M Keynes's "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money", written in 1936, is one of the most controversial books in the history of economic theory. lt is suggested that one reason for the intensive attention drawn by this work is the practical importance gained by its recipes to the crisis of world economy at that time, the other is its accomplishment on cutting off the contemporary crisis of economic theory. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to reveal the theoretical framework of General Theory 's propositions, evidently, that is, the conclusions of goods, money and labor markets, and the methodology, taking into account the neoclassical tradition before Keynes. Place of marginalism as the dominant paradigm of economics in the pre-Keynesian economic thought, the importance of marginalist attitudes in decission making processes, in this respect Keynes 's position in the history of economics, to what extent his work connotes a paradigmal shift from the neoclassical paradigm and to what extent it is a complement to the neoclassical school are the main points to be discussed in the paper. We aim to arrive at a conclusion on the question whether Keynes achieved a paradigmal shift or his work is just a complement to the old theoretical framework. [English Keywords] General Theory, Marginalism, Keynes, Neoclassical Economics, Paradigm
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ey.10660
    Download Restriction: No restriction for articles.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5455/ey.10660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eyd:eyjrnl:v:19:y:2008:i:66:p:73-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ozan Eruygur (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekonomikyaklasim.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.