IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejnmjr/77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Cosmetic Treatments on Seborrheic Dermatitis Using the 80/20 Method

Author

Listed:
  • Emin Cadar

    (“Ovidius” University of Constanta, Faculty of Pharmacy, Constanta, 900470, Romania)

  • Pascale Carolina

Abstract

Seborrheic dermatitis poses a persistent challenge for both patients and dermatologists, necessitating effective treatment strategies that address symptoms and provide long-term relief. This abstract explores the application of the Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, in the development and utilization of cosmetics for managing seborrheic dermatitis. The Pareto Principle suggests that roughly 80% of outcomes result from 20% of inputs. In the context of seborrheic dermatitis treatment with cosmetics, this principle underscores the importance of identifying and prioritizing key ingredients and formulations that deliver the most significant therapeutic benefits. By leveraging the Pareto Principle, pharmacy managers can highlight the products which bring the highest profits in order to maximize profits. Furthermore, the Pareto Principle informs strategic marketing and distribution efforts, directing resources towards promoting and disseminating products that offer optimal efficacy and patient satisfaction. In conclusion, the application of the Pareto Principle in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis with cosmetics offers a systematic framework for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and enhancing patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Emin Cadar & Pascale Carolina, 2024. "Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Cosmetic Treatments on Seborrheic Dermatitis Using the 80/20 Method," European Journal of Natural Sciences and Medicine, European Center for Science Education and Research, vol. 7, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejnmjr:77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejnmjr:77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejnm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.