IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing a Methodologic Approach to Territory Categorization Using Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • Margarida Miguel Costeira e Pereira

    (Research Centre for Anthropology and Health; Department of Geography and Tourism of the University of Coimbra)

  • Helena Guilhermina da Silva Marques Nogueira

Abstract

The more traditional perspective in Geography views territory as a dichotomous reality of sociodemographic and biophysical characteristics yet, literature states that both territorial dimensions coexist and interact. The number of indicators for each territorial dimension is vast which makes the territory categorization a complex task. Despite it, territory categorization generates knowledge about the differences between territories that improve the planning process and make it more directed and strategic. This work main goal is to test a methodologic approach to categorize Lisbon Municipality area at the statistical section level, integrating information on the physical and social aspects. For this purpose, multivariate and complementary statistical analysis techniques will be used: Principal Component Analysis (applied to the physical and social aspects of the territory) and Hierarchical Classification Analysis (based in the factors extracted in the Principal Component Analysis). The resulting clusters will then be mapped and its distribution will be tested for spatial autocorrelation.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarida Miguel Costeira e Pereira & Helena Guilhermina da Silva Marques Nogueira, 2022. "Testing a Methodologic Approach to Territory Categorization Using Census Data," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, ejms_v7_i.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:527
    DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p345-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://brucol.be/index.php/ejms/article/view/5838
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://brucol.be/files/articles/ejms_v7_i1_22/Pereira.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p345-354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & James Y. L. Thong & Frank K. Y. Chan & Paul J. H. Hu, 2016. "Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 87-111, March.
    2. De Nicola, Antonio & Villani, Maria Luisa & Brugnoli, Maria Cristina & D'Agostino, Gregorio, 2016. "A methodology for modeling and measuring interdependencies of information and communications systems used for public administration and eGovernment services," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 18-27.
    3. M. Doornbos, 2001. "'Good Governance': The Rise and Decline of a Policy Metaphor?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 93-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Mei & Xiaoyan Xu & Xiaodong Li, 2020. "Encouraging Patient Engagement Behaviors from the Perspective of Functional Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    4. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Arnouts, Rikke & van der Zouwen, Mariëlle & Arts, Bas, 2012. "Analysing governance modes and shifts — Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 43-50.
    6. Honora, Andreawan & Chih, Wen-Hai & Wang, Kai-Yu, 2022. "Managing social media recovery: The important role of service recovery transparency in retaining customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Ming Yang & Jinglu Jiang & Melody Kiang & Fangyun Yuan, 2022. "Re-Examining the Impact of Multidimensional Trust on Patients’ Online Medical Consultation Service Continuance Decision," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 983-1007, June.
    8. Vasudha Chhotray, 2006. "Contrasting visions for aid and governance in the 21st century: the White House Millennium Challenge Account and DFID`s Drivers of Change," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-062, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Kafayat Amusa & Nara Monkam & Nicola Viegi, 2016. "The political and economic dynamics of foreign aid: A case study of United States and Chinese aid to Sub-Sahara Africa," Working Papers 77, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    10. Chiraag Roy, 2020. "Rethinking Australia’s aid programme to Myanmar: Good governance and “informal constraints”," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(5), pages 630-645, September.
    11. Heng Tang & Xiaowan Lin, 2019. "Curbing shopping cart abandonment in C2C markets — an uncertainty reduction approach," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 533-552, September.
    12. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    13. Yang, Xue, 2021. "Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use social recommender systems: A self-regulation perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Hazel Gray, 2016. "Access Orders and the ‘New’ New Institutional Economics of Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 51-75, January.
    15. Nwaobi, Godwin, 2011. "The Economics of Politics vs the Politics of Economics: Nigerian case," MPRA Paper 28675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Nourallah, Mustafa, 2023. "One size does not fit all: Young retail investors’ initial trust in financial robo-advisors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2012. "Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-030, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Severin Weiler & Christian Matt & Thomas Hess, 2022. "Immunizing with information – Inoculation messages against conversational agents’ response failures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 239-258, March.
    19. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2022. "Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 641-652, January.
    20. Ciesielska, Magdalena & Rizun, Nina & Chabik, Jakub, 2022. "Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.