Author
Abstract
This research paper addresses means of evidence in contested procedure, through describing and analyzing all means of evidence recognized under the Law No. 03/L-066 for the Contested Procedure in Kosovo (hereinafter LCP). This research, amongst others, provides for a comparative overview on certain important issues between LCP, the old Law on Contested Procedure in Kosovo which was in force until 2008, and the Code of Civil Procedure of Albania (hereinafter CCPr). Nonetheless, despite containing comparative elements, the research, in its entirety, aims to elaborate the means of evidence in line with LCP, while highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of relevant legal dispositions in Kosovo covering this matter. This paper will initially define means of evidence, the importance these means have on determining relevant and contentious facts between litigants, universally recognized facts as well as facts which must be necessarily determined through means of evidence. Following this, this paper will elaborate other institutes relevant for the contested procedure, as: object of evidence, obtainment and assessment of evidence, etc. This paper will initially provide a description and explanation of means of evidence foreseen under LCP of the Republic of Kosovo. Given that it is precisely the evidence administered in a contested procedure what gives direction to determining the merits of the case in a certain matter, this paper pays particular attention to evidence obtaining methods, starting from examination, evidence administration through experts, and party hearing. This research paper humbly acknowledges that it does not suggest that all elements and matters concerning means of evidence in contested procedure have been covered. Nonetheless, we are confident that it does cover the fundaments of the addressed topic.
Suggested Citation
Artan Qerkini, 2021.
"Means of Evidence in the Contested Procedure,"
European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, May - Aug.
Handle:
RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:311
DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v3i3.p101-110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.