IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The most valuable discussion about the nature of language that never took place from Wittgenstein to Baldwin via Calvino

Author

Listed:
  • Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema

    (Utrecht University, Nederland)

Abstract

James Baldwin and Ludwig Wittgenstein were both concerned with what language use is capable of and what the duty of the thinker should be . This essay examines, via Italo Calvino’s ideas on the relationship between writing and world, what the contrast Wittgenstein/Baldwin tells us about the ethics of meaning, Wittgenstein’s ‘leaves everything as it is’ conception of thought is contrasted with Baldwin’s thoughts on racism, language and the duty of the writer. It is concluded that Baldwin drives Wittgenstein’s philosophical position further than Wittgenstein could do himself and that ethically neutral language use is itself a linguistic confusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema, 2023. "The most valuable discussion about the nature of language that never took place from Wittgenstein to Baldwin via Calvino," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 10, January -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls/article/view/1035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejls_v10_i1_24/Mollema.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.