IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Distancing v. Physical Distancing – Why is the Term Social Distancing Globally Accepted in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Svoboda

    (PhD, Lecturer of Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka)

Abstract

Many measures are being taken during the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. One of the primary concepts that appeared throughout the media was “social distancing†. Over the months, this term rose to become an omnipresent catchword, used over and over in the news on TV, the radio, in newspapers and journals as well as in everyday communication. In this article the term “social distancing†will be examined in relation to the term “physical distancing†. Is it “social distancing†or “physical distancing†that is preventing us from being infected with the virus? The term “social distancing†is analysed from a linguistic, socio-historical and psychological point of view and its use is questioned in the context of the dominant imperative. Furthermore, an attempt will be made to uncover when and in which context the term “social distance†was established and why it has been adopted worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the term “physical distancing†, which the author considers to be more appropriate within the context of the recommended measures, was neglected, even though this is the term the WHO is using in their instructions and guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Svoboda, 2021. "Social Distancing v. Physical Distancing – Why is the Term Social Distancing Globally Accepted in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic?," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:212
    DOI: 10.26417/819mez18s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls/article/view/972
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/819mez18s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.