IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contrastive Analysis of English and Albanian Somatic Idioms - A Cognitive Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Arben Gaba

    (“Eqrem Ҫabej†University, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Department of Foreign Languages, English Branch)

Abstract

In this paper we try to make a cognitive comparison between phraseological expressions originating from body-part terms in English and Albanian (taking English as our starting point). Although these languages are distant in space they do have similarities. This similarity / difference is seen better than nowhere else in the way how they conceive of the world (and the way this is expressed linguistically). They are at different stages of their linguistic cultivation where English is in a dominant position (remember here that every technological innovation has knock-on linguistic effects that affect every language including Albanian) and Albanian is in a defensive position since it has to cope with a host of concepts and realities that in one way or another have to be made tangible to Albanian speakers as well. Phraseological expressions are conceived as the tip of the iceberg of a process grounded upon transformational mechanisms (the best known of which are metaphors and metonymy) with emotional coloring adding to the mix. By way of illustration we give the following example: get blood from/out of a stone - nxjerr dhjam? nga pleshti, nxjerr uj? nga guri (extract fat out of a flea, extract water from the stone) Albanian literal translation in italics and brackets. From what we see, Albanians associate the equivalent of the English phraseological unit with water (since they are a Mediterranean country with dry summers), or with fat and flea (Albanians are known for their animal husbandry and meat-related terms).

Suggested Citation

  • Arben Gaba, 2021. "A Contrastive Analysis of English and Albanian Somatic Idioms - A Cognitive Perspective," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:202
    DOI: 10.26417/498diq14u
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls/article/view/959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejls_v6_i1_20/Gaba.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/498diq14u?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.