IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Factors in English Teachers’ Professional Development in China – A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kathy O’Sullivan

    (United Business Institutes (Belgium, China, Luxembourg))

Abstract

This case study is set in the context of globalisation, framing its analysis of issues relating to professional development of teachers of English language in China against the global background of English language teaching reform. In Asia generally, and particularly in China, where the focus of education in recent years has shifted from access to quality of teaching and learning, an existing plethora of underqualified teaching staff, mainly because of rapid higher education expansion, constitutes a major barrier to regular participation in professional development programs. Barriers identi?ed as impacting on the provision of good quality teaching arose, largely, from the pressures due to the demands of curriculum reform and the often-changing expectations of university leadership, which highlighted tensions between a traditional reliance on the primacy of exam results and a newer demand for holistic development and lifelong learning. Following a review of the literature on aspects of teacher professional development, and a discussion of the current policy context in China, a range of ?ndings will be used to illustrate common stakeholder expectations, as well as teacher beliefs and practice. The analysis of the narratives uncovers issues of identity and power, in the shaping of the participants’ practice and professional trajectories. The analysis provides illustration of how limitation in professional participation can result in limitation of innovative practice. Concerns regarding barriers to further development are also highlighted. The study offers recommendations to promote innovative practice which can support more effective teaching and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathy O’Sullivan, 2021. "Critical Factors in English Teachers’ Professional Development in China – A Case Study," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, May - Aug.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:155
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v4i3.p6-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls/article/view/918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejls_v4_i2_18/Kathy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls.v4i3.p6-16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.