IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejisjr/271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hume on The Epistemological Status of Metaphysical Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Stanley Tweyman

    (University Professor, Humanities and Graduate Philosophy, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

My paper examines critically the widespread view that Hume confines meaningful propositions to those which are analytic (a priori), and those which are synthetic empirical, thereby rejecting synthetic a priori propositions as meaningful. What I show is that Hume does recognize certain metaphysical synthetic a priori propositions as meaningful, thereby dispelling the traditional view that Hume rejects all synthetic a priori as meaningful.Keywords: analytic a priori, synthetic empirical, synthetic a priori, meaning

Suggested Citation

  • Stanley Tweyman, 2021. "Hume on The Epistemological Status of Metaphysical Statements," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:271
    DOI: 10.26417/453wrq61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejis/article/view/1660
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v8_i1_22/Tweyman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/453wrq61?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:1:y:1962:i:3:p:203-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.