IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2012i5p84-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Process of Evidencing (Offer of Proof) at Administrative Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Alma Vokopola
  • Julejda G�rxhi

Abstract

The investigatory procedure carried out by an administrative organ during administrative proceedings is indispensable. There is no doubt that �lex specialis�, in several cases, tend to detail this process, however, it needs a �lex generalis� act which will regulated principally all the important elements of the investigatory procedure. The Code of Administrative Procedure is an act, which naturally poses its problematic, however it is very important for prescribing such institute of administrative proceedings. Due to such significance, the analysis of judicial means being available to an organ of public administration for evaluating complexly the totality of facts and proofs and certainly for identifying present problems, is the central pillar of this report.

Suggested Citation

  • Alma Vokopola & Julejda G�rxhi, 2012. "The Process of Evidencing (Offer of Proof) at Administrative Procedure," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 5, pages 84-95, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:84-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-084-095.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-084-095.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaltrina Zekolli, 2017. "Open Assessment of Proofs in Litigation," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 15, pages 151-157, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:84-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.