IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2012i5p108-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respect for privacy from the Strasbourg perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenc Danaj
  • Aleks Prifti

Abstract

Following a general overview of the EHCR case of law and some of its distinctive features, this article focuses on explaining the meaning of �privacy�, and guaranteed as a fundamental right in light of Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, using as illustrations the verdicts of some cases judged by the institutions of Strasbourg. Certain paragraphs of the article address a series of issues, which according to the Court-referring to the images created by the Convention-cover a range , within which any individual may freely follow the development of their personality. The article also raises some questions, which the ECHR has often fully answered,or at least, indirectly implied. The author elaborates also on limits of privacy as foreseen by paragraph 2 of Article8, as well as on some obligations that the Convention assigns to its contracting State-Parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenc Danaj & Aleks Prifti, 2012. "Respect for privacy from the Strasbourg perspective," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 5, pages 108-118, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:108-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-108-118.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr5/Academicus-MMXII-5-108-118.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nora Osmani, 2016. "Privacy and data protection: Legal aspects in the Republic of Macedonia," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 14, pages 59-68, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2012:i:5:p:108-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.