Author
Listed:
- Galina B. Vlasova
- Maria V.Kicha
- Nikolay V. Saraev
- Alla R. Shvanderova
- Gennady S. Pratsko
- Valery K. Tsechoev
Abstract
Purpose: Considering the modern law-making in Anglo-Saxon legal family, the authoresses raise several topical issues, through the prism of which the common law system appears to be a legal phenomenon. Answering the questions posed, the author pays special attention to the works of Anglo-Saxon legal scholars, judicial precedents, and archival documents. In addition, he analyzes Anglo-Saxon law from the standpoint of judicial law-making, which is of relevance to modern Russian law. The document addresses the key issues of judicial lawmaking in the Anglo-Saxon legal family. Design/Methodology/Approach: Applying best practices, we focus on five main issues that address fundamental aspects of lawmaking in the Anglo-Saxon legal family. The questions posed are of a doctrinal nature and, at the same time, are formulated considering the modern realities in which Anglo-Saxon law now functions. Findings: The results demonstrate that the Anglo-Saxon law-making objectively functions despite the legal culture of the judges of the corresponding legal family. Practical Implications: Judicial lawmaking is the basis of the Anglo-Saxon legal family and legal culture, whose evolution was conditioned by the historical and political-legal development of Anglo-Saxon law. Originality/Value. Understanding the features of judicial lawmaking in the Anglo-Saxon legal family allows us to understand the logic of one of the largest legal families in the world and contributes to integrative and globalization processes in modern jurisprudence. In addition, it determines the availability and effectiveness of international professional and political and legal communication, as well as international cooperation.
Suggested Citation
Galina B. Vlasova & Maria V.Kicha & Nikolay V. Saraev & Alla R. Shvanderova & Gennady S. Pratsko & Valery K. Tsechoev, 2020.
"Contemporary Lawmaking in Anglo Saxon Law: Problems and Prospects,"
International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 778-785.
Handle:
RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:778-785
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:778-785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.