IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Open Method of Coordination - Effectively preventing welfare state retrenchment?

Author

Listed:
  • Büchs, Milena

Abstract

This article re-examines the division between 'optimists' and 'pessimists' within the literature on the Open Method of Coordination’s (OMC) effectiveness. Each of those 'camps' tends to focus on a different question. 'Optimists' are more concerned with the question of whether the OMC exerts an influence on the national level and through which mechanisms, whilst 'pessimists' concentrate on the question of whether the OMC can 'strengthen' EU social policy and therefore European welfare states. This article combines these two perspectives and argues that the OMC is indeed capable of influencing national policies through the dissemination of ideas and 'learning' as the 'optimists' stress. However, policy 'learning' at the member state level is shaped and constrained by a variety of internal and external pressures. Against the hopes of most of the OMC 'optimists', this makes the OMC largely ineffective in preventing welfare state retrenchment.

Suggested Citation

  • Büchs, Milena, 2009. "The Open Method of Coordination - Effectively preventing welfare state retrenchment?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-011a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2009-011.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.