IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EC in the WTO: The three-level game of decision-making. What multilateralism can learn from regionalism

Author

Listed:
  • Leal-Arcas, Rafael

Abstract

This paper is a comparative institutional analysis of the EC's decision-making process in trade policy by focusing on three variables, i.e., competence (whether national or EC competence in EC trade policy), control (who controls the EC's position in international trade negotiations: the Commission or the EU Member States?) and efficiency versus accountability (technocratic versus democratic trade policy) at the national and supranational levels. The empirical background is the World Trade Organization, to which the EC and its Member States are members and, more precisely, the Doha Development Agenda, where the position of the EC is analyzed. The EC institutions and their interaction with EU Member States' institutions and trade policy is the core of this paper. The problems that the enlarged EU will face in its internal decision-making process (such as transparency, efficiency, accountability) can be paralleled to the WTO's decision-making process, and thus the European experience can be used as a role or guidance in the WTO forum so that we can learn from the EC's benefits and, more importantly, avoid the mistakes of the European experience in the decision-making process of international trade fora . The paper concludes that EC trade policy, as well as WTO rules and policies, need to change to become more efficient and accountable at the same time as they address the issue of lack of transparency and legitimacy of the current system of governance, denounced by the Laeken European Council. Thus, more leadership is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Leal-Arcas, Rafael, 2004. "The EC in the WTO: The three-level game of decision-making. What multilateralism can learn from regionalism," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-014a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-014.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-014.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1957. "European Coal and Steel Community," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 694-698, October.
    2. Anonymous, 1957. "European Coal and Steel Community," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 400-404, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Grabas & Alexander Nützenadel, 2013. "Industrial Policies in Europe in Historical Perspective. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 15," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46867, April.
    2. Gianni Lo Schiavo, 2022. "The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and the EU Anti-Money Laundering framework compared: governance, rules, challenges and opportunities," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 91-105, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.