IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EC in GATT/WTO negotiations: From Rome to Nice Have EC Trade Policy Reforms Been Good Enough for a Coherent EC Trade Policy in the WTO?

Author

Listed:
  • Leal-Arcas, Rafael

Abstract

This article is an attempt to a thorough chronological analysis of the ECs existing law in the field of international trade since the WTO agreement. It deals with the evolution of the ECs common commercial policy competence through the years, starting with the WTO agreement signed in Marrakesh in 1994 until the days of the European Convention establishing a Constitution for Europe, with a view to enabling the EC with a coherent policy in the WTO framework. Thus, a legal analysis of EC trade policy in the pre-Amsterdam Treaty period, at the Treaty of Amsterdam, at the Treaty of Nice and during the European Convention period is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Leal-Arcas, Rafael, 2004. "The EC in GATT/WTO negotiations: From Rome to Nice Have EC Trade Policy Reforms Been Good Enough for a Coherent EC Trade Policy in the WTO?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-001a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-001.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-001.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niemann, Arne, 2011. "Conceptualising Commom Commercial Policy Treaty revision: explaining stagnancy and dynamics from the Amsterdam IGC to the Treaty of Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.