IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eok/journl/v6y2014i4p18-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of TEAR and TFRC throughput for Drop tail and RED Queue Management Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Parminderjeet Singh

    (PCET Lalru)

  • Ameeta Dilbaghi

    (PCET Lalru)

  • Nipun Sharma

    (Quest Group of Institutions Mohali)

Abstract

The comparison of throughput for TEAR (TCP emulation at receivers) and TFRC TCP friendly rate control in MANETs is done with varying Active queue Management Techniques. The analysis reveals that for bandwidth constraint links, TEAR and TFRC perform far better than normal traffic propagation through TCP. In case of TEAR, the processing and route congestion algorithm load is shared by the receiver resulting in lesser load at the transmitters. In TFRC the TCP traffic is propagated via an algorithm to curb acknowledgement congestions. The effect of these two techniques is monitored on Droptail and RED, two of the most common Active Queue Management Techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Parminderjeet Singh & Ameeta Dilbaghi & Nipun Sharma, 2014. "Comparison of TEAR and TFRC throughput for Drop tail and RED Queue Management Techniques," Oeconomics of Knowledge, Saphira Publishing House, vol. 6(4), pages 18-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eok:journl:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:18-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sites.google.com/site/oeconomicsofknowledge/v6_i4_2014_ns.pdf?attredirects=0
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eok:journl:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:18-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felician ALECU (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.