IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/srjpps/v9y2013i3p479-495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR: a case for employee skills‐based volunteering

Author

Listed:
  • Shelly McCallum
  • Melissa Ann Schmid
  • Lawrence Price

Abstract

Purpose - As companies face an ever wider range of challenges, there is growing adoption of CSR initiatives to aid company success. The business case for CSR investigates the potential for economic value in socially oriented company actions. This paper aims to examine one key CSR initiative, that of employee skill‐based volunteerism. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers consider three current applications of employee skill‐based volunteerism and the potential to generate company economic value. Findings - This concept paper suggests employee skill‐based volunteerism aligns with the four components of the business case for CSR, including the enhancement of company reputation, the reduction of costs and risk, the achievement of business strategy, and the creation of learning and partnership. Research limitations/implications - This paper focuses on three companies' employee skill‐based volunteerism programs and does not reflect the comprehensiveness of a meta‐analysis. Hence conclusions are limited in generalization. Further investigation of company CSR program initiatives and their impact both short term and long term is suggested. Practical implications - This paper seeks to highlight the potential for economic value within CSR initiatives. By considering the role of employee skill‐based volunteerism, this paper considers this specific CSR initiative and its potential for generating economic benefits for a company. Originality/value - The authors suggest that employee skill‐based volunteerism can serve as a unique differentiating strategy employing the knowledge, skills and abilities of employees that are specific to any given company. As CSR initiatives continue to be adopted, there remains a need to learn which initiatives may serve as significant sources of economic value for a company, as well as how best these initiatives can be implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelly McCallum & Melissa Ann Schmid & Lawrence Price, 2013. "CSR: a case for employee skills‐based volunteering," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 479-495, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:479-495
    DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0053/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0053/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaroslav Mazanec, 2022. "Corporate Volunteering as a Current Phenomenon in Corporate Social Responsibility to Support the Career Development and Professional Skills of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of t," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Lodsgård, Lise & Aagaard, Annabeth, 2017. "Creating value through CSR across company functions and NGO collaborations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 162-174.
    3. Sanjukta Choudhury Kaul & Quamrul Alam & Manjit Singh Sandhu, 2022. "Why Disability Mainstreaming is Good for Business: A New Narrative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 861-873, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:479-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.