IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/srjpps/v4y2008i4p527-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understandable and functional organizational values: true or false?

Author

Listed:
  • Merita Mattila

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show that in many earlier value studies, the emphasis has been in value management: this paper contributes to the value discussion through personnel perceptions in organizations (in different hierarchical levels). The aim is to study value processing more closely at company level and to find out what the phenomenon in practice means to the personnel: how they understand it. There is often said to be a contradiction between official and perceived values among personnel: these are studied further in this paper. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative, multiple case study, interviews analyzed by content analysis. Findings - This paper demonstrates value perceptions among personnel in three case companies and emphasizes the importance of mutual understanding of values in every day life. Personnel perceptions of organizational values are presented; especially the understanding of values as a management tool is studied further: values have to be understood through the own work before they can be really functional. Research limitations/implications - The quotations are interpreted through content analysis, so maybe another (e.g. discourse analysis) would have given deeper insight. Three different case companies are maybe too little to make any general assumptions. Practical implications - The need to reach mutual understanding about values among the whole personnel (not just the management) is extremely important in successful value processing. Too often these “soft” issues are forgotten and values are just declared by the management: no real understanding about organizational values exist. The practical implications are presented when suggestions for better values processing are given. Originality/value - The paper demonstrates personnel perceptions in understanding organizational values. It is extremely important to clarify how people understand organizational values, before proceeding to the implementation process. This is too often forgotten in values studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Merita Mattila, 2008. "Understandable and functional organizational values: true or false?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(4), pages 527-537, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:527-537
    DOI: 10.1108/17471110810909920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17471110810909920/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17471110810909920/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17471110810909920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:527-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.