Author
Listed:
- Fernanda de Paiva Duarte
- Benedict Young Imbun
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to canvass the views of villagers from a remote region of Papua New Guinea (PNG) on food security issues in their community and their level of satisfaction with food security initiatives provided by the extractive company that operated on their land. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative design: data gathered through 14 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and a discussion forum with 20 villagers fromPawa. Purposive sampling. Snow-balling method of recruitment. Findings - Food security was identified as a growing concern among the villagers, who also expressed dissatisfaction with the food security projects offered through the corporate social responsibility (CSR) program offered by the company operating on their land. Communication problems between company and community and lack of trust were evident. Research limitations/implications - Possibility of self-selection bias among participants. The perspective of the company was under-represented. Practical implications - The study highlights the need for CSR practitioners to be mindful of the importance of effective communication with local communities. Social Implications - The study reveals the importance of meaningful dialogue between company and host communities, which can lead to a more efficient allocation of resources and empowerment of host communities. Originality/value - The study bridges a research gap in the field of CSR in developing countries because food security, as a CSR issue in PNG communities, is under-researched. The study contributes to a better understanding of company –community relations in PNG and how these relations can be improved through a more normative approach to CSR. It also highlights the importance of empowering host communities through meaningful dialogue.
Suggested Citation
Fernanda de Paiva Duarte & Benedict Young Imbun, 2016.
"Food security in Papua New Guinea: the need to go beyond “business case CSR”,"
Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 523-534, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:12:y:2016:i:3:p:523-534
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2015-0129
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:12:y:2016:i:3:p:523-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.